Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 41 (2.35 seconds)

The Sakhigopal Regulated Market ... vs Brudaban Chandra Hota And Anr. on 28 August, 1990

The next decision is the Full Bench decision of the Patna High Court in Amar Singh Yadav's case (AIR 1987 Patna 191 (FB)). One of the questions that was posed for answer to the Full Bench was whether a person who was not before the Land Acquisition Officer could maintain an application for being impleaded as a party under Order 1, Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure in the reference proceeding before the District Judge under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act and Sandhawalia, C.J. speaking for the Court, answered as follows:--
Orissa High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 1 - G B Patnaik - Full Document

Deepak Tyagi & 14 Ors. vs Shree Chhatrapati Shivaji Education ... on 20 January, 2020

32.     We rely on the Judgement of the Full Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Amar Singh Yadav & Ors. Vs. Shanta Devi & Ors., AIR 1987 Patna 191, in which the Hon'ble Supreme Court while deciding the Law of Precedence has observed that when there is a direct conflict between two decisions of the Supreme Court of co-equal Bench, the subordinate Court must follow the judgements which states the law more elaborately and accurately and that the question whether the decision is earlier or later is not material.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 31 - Cited by 74 - R K Agrawal - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next