Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.42 seconds)
Documents citing Hemant Kothari vs Indore Development Authority on 20 June, 2016

Parmanand Chandrawanshi vs State Of Chhattisgarh 86 Wpc/80/2018 ... on 23 October, 2018

In the matter of Tarabai Vs. Indore Municipal Corporation, Indore, it has been held that setting back by legal fiction shall have the effect of vesting 5 that land in Corporation and such vesting does not depend on payment of compensation. In view of this, it cannot be held that until payment of compensation is made, the authorities are not competent to raise any construction for widening of road or for construction of drain. However, at the same time, every citizen whose land is included in the building line demarcated by the Corporation in accordance with Section 305 of the Act is entitled to receive reasonable compensation as provided under the proviso to Section 305 and under Section 306 of the Act, 1956, though sub-section (3) of Section 306 further provides that in assessing such compensation, regard shall be had to the benefits accruing to that owner from the development of the land belonging to him and affected by such street.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 13 - P K Mishra - Full Document

Govind Nankani vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 21 December, 2016

In the matter of Tarabai Vs. Indore Municipal Corporation, Indore {(1977) 1 MPWN 321}, it has been held that setting back by legal fiction shall have the effect of vesting that land in Corporation and such vesting does not depend on payment of compensation. In view of this, it cannot be held that until payment of compensation is made, the authorities are not competent to raise any construction for widening of road or for construction of drain. However, at the same time, every citizen whose land is included in the building line demarcated by the Corporation in accordance with Section 305 of 4 the Act is entitled to receive reasonable compensation as provided under the proviso to Section 305 and under Section 306 of the Act, 1956, though sub-section (3) of Section 306 further provides that in assessing such compensation, regard shall be had to the benefits accruing to that owner from the development of the land belonging to him and affected by such street.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - P K Mishra - Full Document
1