Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.88 seconds)
Documents citing The State Of Maharashtra vs Amit @ Ammu Son Of Gajanan Gandhi on 4 February, 2003

State vs (1) Amit Lohia @ Sonu on 17 January, 2014

29. He was also cross examined at length on behalf of accused Amit Lohia @ Sonu and he has stated further in his such cross examination that his statement was recorded by the police in the PS itself during the night of the incident and he had told the police in his above statement that he had received a call on his mobile phone, when he had reached at the Arjangarh Metro Station, and he had stopped his vehicle on the roadside for hearing the above call, he had also told the police SC No. 02/11 State Vs. Amit Lohia @ Sonu & Anr.
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Amit @ Sonu on 7 September, 2024

I called the PS and informed the said incident to PS. Thereafter, SI Subhash Chand came on the spot and checked the vehicle and found containing 11 petties of illicit liquor bottles. Thereafter, my statement was recorded which is Ex. PW1/A bearing my signatures at point A. Total 11 petties of quarter bottles of illicit liquor of 180 ml having label of NV Group Bestow Whiskey for sale in Arunachal Pradesh only which was total 528 quarter bottles, NV Group was mentioned on the cap of each bottle. Thereafter, one sample bottle was taken out from each petti and remaining 517 bottles were kept back inside the respective petties and sealed the petties with the white pullanda with the seal of SC. All the petties were given serial no. S1 to S11. Sample bottles were also kept in a white pullanda and sealed with the seal of SC and samples were given serial no. 1A to Page no. 3 of 15 Cr Cases 50789/2016 STATE Vs. AMIT @ SONU 143 /2012 (R.K. Puram), u/s 33/58 of Delhi Excise Act 11A. Form M29 was filled on the spot by the IO. IO seized the illicit liquor petties vide seizure memo Ex. PW1/B bearing my signatures at point A. Seal after use was handed over to me by SI Subhash Chand. The offending TATA Sumo vehicle bearing no. HR-59A- 0123 was seized and taken into possession by the IO vide seizure memo Ex. PW1/C bearing my signatures at point A. Thereafter, IO prepared site plan at my instance which is Ex. PW1/D bearing my signatures at point A. Thereafter, IO prepared the rukka of the present case and handed over the same to Ct. Virender for registration of the FIR. Thereafter, I was relieved from investigation". Said witness correctly identified the accused. Said witness was duly cross-examined by ld. Counsel for accused.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Amit Gandhi on 2 April, 2018

In the present case convict has been convicted for offence punishable u/s. 3 DPDP Act.  No previous conviction has been alleged or proved against convict.  The convict is not involved in any such case, as State Vs. Amit Gandhi; FIR No. 49/18; PS RG 2/2 stated by him.  Convict is having a family to support.   Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the accused/convict is facing trial for defacing the public property   by   putting   a   poster   for   advertisement   of   his   shop.     I   am   of considered   view   that   ends   of   justice   would   be   met   if   the   convict   is admonished u/s. 3 of The Probation of Offender's Act, 1958.  Further u/s. 5 of The Probation of Offender's Act, 1958, convict is directed to deposit Rs.500 /­ as the cost of the proceedings of the court.  The same has been deposited.  Receipt be issued.
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Sanjay on 16 April, 2018

In the present case convict has been convicted for offence punishable u/s. 3 DPDP Act.  No previous conviction has been alleged or proved against convict.  The convict is not involved in any such case, as State Vs. Amit Gandhi; FIR No. 49/18; PS RG 2/2 stated by him.  Convict is having a family to support.   Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the accused/convict is facing trial for defacing the public property by putting a board.  I am of considered view that ends of justice would be met if the convict is admonished u/s. 3 of The Probation of Offender's Act, 1958.  Further u/s. 5 of The Probation of Offender's Act, 1958, convict is directed to deposit Rs.500/­ as the cost of the proceedings of the court.  The same has been deposited.  Receipt be issued.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The State Of Maharashtra vs Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik on 24 March, 2009

43. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor relied on a judgment of this Court in State of Maharashtra v. Amit @ Ammu son of Gujanan Gandhi, reported at 2003 ALL MR (Cri) 710, where the Court was considering the similar confirmation reference arising out of rape and murder of an 11-year-old girl. The case rested on circumstantial evidence. The Court recounted principles of appreciation of circumstantial evidence in para 36 of its judgment and upon appreciation of evidence, found that among other things, the accused and the deceased were seen near deserted house in forest area at Koradi by two prosecution witnesses and that the deceased was in her school uniform. One of those witnesses spotted the dead body of the victim on the next day when he was grazing the cattle and, therefore, gave a report to the police. The accused therein was identified by a test identification parade. The Court held that the circumstances duly established the crime.
Bombay High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 2 - R C Chavan - Full Document

State Of Maharashtra vs Manoharsingh S/O Raghuvirsingh Thakur on 11 August, 2003

63. The learned A.P.P., advocating for confirmation of death sentence, claiming that the nature of the offence i.e. commission of murder of hapless woman and two young children aged about 12 and 7 years, the brutal manner in which they were done to death itself, goes to show that the appellant accused has committed the offences which come within the parameter of rarest of rare case considering the magnitude of the crime which indicates that the appellant accused has no concern for human life. Mr. Loney, the learned A.P.P., further submitted that these gruesome murders of three persons who were alone at the moment and residing in the field i.e. away from the human habitation, have sent shock waives in the community and created terror in the mind of villagers. It is submitted that the manner in which the appellant executed the killings itself go to show that it was premeditated and there is no hope of reformation of the appellantaccused. Mr. Loney submitted that the appellantaccused has taken an opportunity to do away with his victims when Vasanta, the only male member of the family, had gone out, and had come armed and prepared to achieve his intention of finishing Smt. Vimal and her innocent children. Mr. Loney submitted that one could understand if the appellantaccused had merely assaulted Vimal if he had any grievance or quarrel with her and stopped at that stage, but his acts show that he was bent upon wiping off the whole family of Vasanta Deshmukh and even did not spare the two children and, therefore, these are aggravating circumstances which call for confirmation of the death sentence and young age of the accused is not mitigating circumstance and, therefore, this Court may confirm the death sentence imposed by the trial Court. The learned A.P.P. has placed reliance on the following cases in support of his contention. (1)Bachan Singh vs State of Punjab (2)Macchi Singh vs State of Punjab (3)Maghar vs State (4)Ramdeo Chauhan vs State of Assam (5)Amrutlal vs State of Maharashtra (6)Omprakash vs State of Uttranchal (7)State of Maharashtra vs Amit Gandhi (2003 All MR (Cri) 710)
Bombay High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 1 - J N Patel - Full Document
1