Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.28 seconds)
Documents citing Dineshkumar Vasudev Nayak vs State Of Gujarat on 4 March, 2003

State vs . Ramesh on 10 October, 2014

Hence the facts of Vasudev Naik's case (supra) are not applicable in the present case. PW1 has unequivocally deposed that it was the accused who had struck the offending bus from behind thereby causing death of deceased Amit Chamoli. It has already been proved that the accident occurred due to the negligence of the accused. Hence the guilt of the accused for the offence under Section 304A of Indian Penal Code is also proved beyond reasonable doubt.
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Puesh Kumar Gupta & Ors vs State Of Gujarat on 28 August, 2017

2.23 It   was   also   pointed   out   that   the   main  consideration for admitting father of Vishesh Jain to  anticipatory bail was the voluntary deposit of the tax  money  by  Vishesh   Jain,   and  therefore   also,   the   said  case cannot be compared with the facts of the present  case. It was also submitted that there were striking  dissimilarities   between   cases   on   which   parity   is  claimed   and   the   case   of   the   petitioners   herein.  Reliance   has   been   placed   upon   in   the   case   of  Dineshkumar   Vasudev   Nayak   vs.   State   of   Gujarat   reported in (2003) 2 GLH 274 more particularly para 5  thereof, which held that the parity cannot be claimed  on   mere   comparison   of   two   cases   but   individual  attributes of person and other relevant considerations  Page 12 of 21 HC-NIC Page 12 of 21 Created On Sat Sep 02 13:42:00 IST 2017 R/CR.MA/20006/2017 ORDER are   also   required   to   be   taken   into   account   before  applying the principle of parity.
Gujarat High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - G R Udhwani - Full Document
1