Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.23 seconds)
Documents citing Prithviraj S/O. Ambalal Patel vs Bhupendra S/O. Jasubhai Patel And Anr. on 6 January, 1993

Sri Bhaskar Fertilizers And Ors. vs Dinkal Agro Chemicals (P) Ltd. on 4 December, 1995

Prithviraj v. Bhupendra (1994) 3 Crimes 579 (Bombay) is also a case where the cheque was returned unpaid with endorsement 'stopped by the drawer'. The Bombay High Court after considering several decisions in this regard held that "the wording and the endorsement from the bank or the circumstances under which the cheque was returned, were not guiding criteria, but the fact that on presentation of the cheque the payment was not made is the material fact. There would be host of reasons for return of the cheques, but the bottomline of the situation was that the payment could not be made by the banker, leading to the dishonour of the cheque implying insufficient funds."
Andhra HC (Pre-Telangana) Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - V R Reddy - Full Document

Goa Plast Pvt. Ltd. vs Shri Chico Ursula D'Souza on 12 January, 1996

Mr. Usgaokar, the learned Counsel further submitted that if the cheque is dishonoured even on the ground that the payment was stopped, dishonour of the cheque would constitute an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, unless the payment was forthcoming within the prescribed period. To strengthen his submission reliance has been placed on a case of Prithviraj v. Bhupendra (1994 (3) Crimes 579).
Bombay High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 62 - Full Document
1