Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 272 (0.69 seconds)
Documents citing U.P. Public Service Commission vs Alpana on 17 January, 1994

O.A.3663/2 vs Nct Of Delhi & Ors. on 30 March, 2012

Collector and Chairman, Vizianagaram (Social Welfare Residential School Society) Vizianagaram v. M. Tripura Sundari Devi, (1990) 4 Serv LR 237 (SC); Mrs. Rekha Chaturvedi v. University of Rajasthan, (1993) 1 JT (SC) 220 : (1993 AIR SCW 1488 : 1993 Lab IC 1250); Dr. M. V. Nair v. Union of India, (1993) 2 SCC 429 : (1993 AIR SCW 1412 : 1993 Lab IC 1111); and U. P. Public Service Commission, U. P., Allahabad v. Alpana, (1994) 1 JT (SC) 94 : (1994 AIR SCW 2861), the High Court has held (i) that the cut off date by reference to which the eligibility requirement must be satisfied by the candidate seeking a public employment is the date appointed by the relevant service rules and if there be no cut off date appointed by the rules then such date as may be appointed for the purpose in the advertisement calling for applications; ii) that if there be no such date appointed then the eligibility criteria shall be applied by reference to the last date appointed by which the applications have to be received by the competent authority. The view taken by the High Court is supported by several decisions of this Court and is therefore well settled and hence cannot be found fault with. However, there are certain special features of this case which need to be taken care of and justice done by invoking the jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution vested in this Court so as to advance the cause of justice.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 35 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Sunita Devi vs Learned Counsel For The Petitioner ... on 5 February, 2014

(3) SCC 168, U. P. Public Service Commission, U. P. Allahabad v. Alpana (supra) and Ashok Kumar Sharma v. Chander Shekhar (supra) and approved the following proposition laid down by the Punjab and Haryana Kumar Manoj 2014.02.07 09:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No. 9694 of 2009 [6] High Court "..... that the cut off date by reference to which the eligibility requirement must be satisfied by the candidate seeking a public employment is the date appointed by the relevant service rules and if there be no cut off date appointed by the rules then such date as may be appointed for the purpose in the advertisement calling for applications and that if there be no such date appointed then the eligibility criteria shall be applied by reference to the last date appointed by which the applications have to be received by the competent authority."
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - R Bindal - Full Document

Saroj Kumar Nayak & Ors. vs Tribal Cooperative Marketing ... on 21 June, 2021

He h as relied u pon the judgments in the case of N. Suresh Nathan & Anr. (supra), K.C. Gupta (supra), U.P.S.C. v. Alpana (supra), Bimlesh Tanwar (supra), State of West Bengal (supra), Shailendra Dania (supra) and Sheo Narayan Nagar (supra), to contend that if their exists past practice, the same has become a ru le an d t he W.P.(C) 5453/2020 Page 19/21 petitioners are entitled to regularization.
Delhi High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - V K Rao - Full Document

R.Muthuselvi vs The Secretary on 7 October, 2016

Placing reliance on the decisions of this Court in Ashok Kumar Sharma v. Chander Shekhar, A.P. Public Service Commission v. B. Sarat Chandra, District Collector and Chairman, Vizianagaram Social Welfare Residential School Society v. M. Tripura Sundari Devi, Rekha Chaturvedi v. University of Rajasthan, M.V. Nair (Dr) v. Union of India and U.P. Public Service Commission U.P., Allahabad v. Alpana the High Court has held (i) that the cut-off date by reference to which the eligibility requirement must be satisfied by the candidate seeking a public employment is the date appointed by the relevant service rules and if there be no cut-off date appointed by the rules then such date as may be appointed for the purpose in the advertisement calling for applications; (ii) that if there be no such date appointed then the eligibility criteria shall be applied by reference to the last date appointed by which the applications have to be received by the competent authority. The view taken by the High Court is supported by several decisions of this Court and is therefore well settled and hence cannot be found fault with. However, there are certain special features of this case which need to be taken care of and justice be done by invoking the jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution vested in this Court so as to advance the cause of justice."
Madras High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - T Raja - Full Document

Shailesh Kumar Patel vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 2 July, 2013

22. It is also apparent from a perusal of the aforesaid decision and the law laid down by the Supreme Court therein that while doing so the Supreme Court has also taken into consideration its previous judgments rendered 24 W.P No.5978/2013 & 6388/2013 in the cases of Ashok Kumar Sharma vs. Chander Shekhar, (1997) 4 SCC 18; A.P. Public Service Commission vs. B. Sarat Chandra, (1990) 2 SCC 669; District Collector & Chairman, Vizianagaram Social Welfare Residential School Society vs. M. Tripura Sundari Devi, (1990) 3 SCC 655; Rekha Chaturvedi vs. University of Rajasthan, 1993 Supp (3) SCC 168; M. V. Nair (Dr.) vs. Union of India, (1993) 2 SCC 429 and U.P Public Service Commission vs. Alpana, (1994) 2 SCC 723.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 30 - Full Document

Teerath Raj Kulaste vs Madhya Pradesh Lpublic Serveice ... on 1 December, 2016

"Placing reliance on the decisions of this Court in Ashok Kumar Sharma Vs. Chander Shekhar, A.P. Public Service Commission Vs. B. Sarat Chandra, District Collector and Chairman, Vizianagaram Social Welfare Residential School Society Vs. M. Tripura Sundari Devi, Rekha Chaturvedi Vs. University of Rajasthan, M.V. Nair (Dr.) Vs. Union of India and U.P. Public Service Commission U.P., Allahabad Vs. Alpana the High Court has held (i) that the cut-off date by reference to which the eligibility requirement must be satisfied by the candidate seeking a public employment is the date appointed by the relevant service rules and if there be no cut-off date appointed by the rules then such date as may be appointed for the purpose in the advertisement calling for applications; (ii) that if there be no such date appointed then the eligibility criteria shall be applied by reference to the last date appointed by which the applications have to be received by the competent authority. The view taken by the High Court is supported by several decisions of this Court and is therefore well settled and hence cannot be found fault with. However, there are certain special features of this case which need to be taken care of and justice be done by invoking the jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution vested in this Court so as to advance the cause of justice."
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 22 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next