Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.43 seconds)
Documents citing Ratnakar Tanbaji Itankar vs Union Of India on 27 September, 1993

B. Krishan vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 21 September, 2005

The respondent No. 3 lastly submitted that in a writ petition No. 11010/ 2005 entitled T. Ratnakar v. UOI filed before the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad vires of Section 14 of the Cantonment Act, 1924 has been impugned. The writ petitioner in this petition has also sought suspension of the notification dated 6th April, 2005. In this writ petition, the interim order of stay made on 3rd May, 2005 stands vacated by the High Court vide its order dated 17th May, 2005. It is contended that on grounds of judicial impropriety, a substantiative writ petition making a challenge was pending before the Court of competent jurisdiction, and therefore the present writ petition is misconceived and ought not to be entertained.
Delhi High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 0 - G Mittal - Full Document

Union Of India (Uoi) vs Maharashtra State Electricity Board, ... on 27 July, 2001

19. The view that I have taken is backed by a judgment of Division Bench of this Court in the case of Ratnakar Tanbaji Itankar v. Union of India, . In the said judgment, the Division Bench has categorically held that it is only in regard to such claims which are expressly referred to in Section 13(1) of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, that the jurisdiction of Civil Court is sought to be ousted under Section 15 of the said Act. The Division Bench has categorically held in para 24 of the judgment, thus :--
Bombay High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - A P Deshpande - Full Document
1