Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.30 seconds)
Documents citing Bashir-Ud-Din vs Ut Of J&K Th. Additional Principal ... on 15 September, 2023

Arshad Hussain vs Ut Of J&K on 30 December, 2023

4. Mr. C. M. Koul, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner argued that great care and caution is required for the purpose of declaring any person as a history-sheeter as it affects the dignity and reputation of the person. He laid stress that no investigation was pending against the petitioner in any FIR and the trial in charge sheets arising out of aforementioned two FIRs resulted in to acquittal of the petitioner. He placed reliance upon the judgments, titled, Badri Nath Vs. State and others, 2008 (1) JKJ 605, Bashir-Ud-din Vs. UT of J&K and others, 3 WP(Crl) No. 38/2023 MANU/JK/1045/2023 and Jagar Singh Vs. UT of J&K and others, MANU/JK/1295/2023
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - R Oswal - Full Document

Rakesh Choudhary vs Union Territory Of J&K Through on 2 March, 2024

6. From a perusal of Rule 702, it is clear that at the time when the history sheet of a person is opened, a great care and caution has to be exercised by the officer incharge of the Police Station or any other competent officer. The said Rule provides the particulars and the manner in which those particulars are to be recorded in the history sheet. A coordinate Bench of this Court had an occasion to interpret Rule 702 of the J&K Police Rules in the case of Bashir-Ud-Din vs Union Territory of J&K and others, WP(Crl) No. 37/2023 decided on 15.09.2023. The Court, while interpreting the aforesaid Rule observed as under:
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S Dhar - Full Document

Aman Kumar Alias Billa vs U.T Of J&K Through Commissioner on 22 April, 2024

08. From the foresaid analysis of law on the subject and having regard to the mandate of law laid down in Rule 702 of the J&K Police Rules, a great care and caution is to be exercised and taken by the officer before branding a person as a history-sheeter and entering his name/particulars in history sheet. While surveillance of movement of a person, is permissible in accordance with the provisions as contained in the J&K Police Rules but at the same time right to respect of an individual is to be taken care of. No interference with regard to the personal right and liberty can be interfered with by the Police except in accordance with the provisions of law. The name of the person can be entered into the history sheet only on the basis of subjective satisfaction of the competent authority and in the manner as provided in the J&K Police Rules.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - V C Koul - Full Document
1