Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.95 seconds)

Krishnakant Gautam vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 28 July, 2020

Counsel for the petitioner has argued that in similar circumstances the Writ Petition No.4180/2020 in the name of TRIVENI PRASAD MISHRA AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS has been considered and decided by the coordinate bench of this Court on 18.06.2020. The case of the present petitioner is exactly identical to that of petitioners in W.P. 4180/2020. No opportunity of hearing was granted to the petitioners while passing the impugned order.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - V Mishra - Full Document

Yaduveer Singh Jadon vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 28 July, 2020

Counsel for the petitioner has argued that in similar circumstances the Writ Petition No.4180/2020 in the name of TRIVENI PRASAD MISHRA AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS has been considered and decided by the coordinate bench of this Court on 18.06.2020. The case of the present petitioner is exactly identical to that of petitioners in W.P. 4180/2020. No opportunity of hearing was granted to the petitioners while passing the impugned order.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 2 - V Mishra - Full Document

Banwarilal Bansal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 28 July, 2020

Counsel for the petitioner has argued that in similar circumstances the Writ Petition No.4180/2020 in the name of TRIVENI PRASAD MISHRA AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS has been considered and decided by the coordinate bench of this Court on 18.06.2020. The case of the present petitioner is exactly identical to that of petitioners in W.P. 4180/2020. No opportunity of hearing was granted to the petitioners while passing the impugned order.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - V Mishra - Full Document

Rajendra Singh Tomar vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 28 July, 2020

Counsel for the petitioner has argued that in similar circumstances the Writ Petition No.4180/2020 in the name of TRIVENI PRASAD MISHRA AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS has been considered and decided by the coordinate bench of this Court on 18.06.2020. The case of the present petitioner is exactly identical to that of petitioners in W.P. 4180/2020. No opportunity of hearing was granted to the petitioners while passing the impugned order.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 3 - V Mishra - Full Document

Mukesh Khede vs State Of Mp on 21 September, 2020

Indisputably, this Court in number of petitions has dealt with this issue wherein challenge was made to the order issued by the Commissioner, Public Instructions inflicting the punishment of withholding of annual increments for the reason that in consequence of not getting the proper result, it was gathered that the Principal has been found guilty as they have shown poor performance and therefore punished accordingly. The said order was held illegal and was set aside by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.No.4180/2020 (Triveni Prasad Mishra & Others v. The State of M.P. & Ors.) vide order dated 18.06.2020 and a liberty was granted to the respondents to pass appropriate order in accordance with law, if they so desire.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Dwivedi - Full Document

Smt. Savita Chourasia vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 15 September, 2020

Indisputably, this Court in number of petitions has dealt with this issue wherein challenge was made to the order issued by the Commissioner, Public Instructions on 07.02.2020 inflicting the punishment of withholding of annual increments for the reason that in consequence of not getting the proper result, it was gathered that the Principal has been found guilty as they have shown poor performance and therefore punished accordingly. The said order was held illegal and was set aside by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.No.4180/2020 (Triveni Prasad Mishra & Others v. The State of M.P. & Ors.) vide order dated 18.06.2020 and a liberty was granted to the respondents to pass appropriate order in accordance with law, if they so desire.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Dwivedi - Full Document

Chandra Kumar Shukla vs State Of M.P. on 5 October, 2020

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in an identical petitions, considering the same nature of orders under challenge, this Court has allowed the writ petition i.e. W.P. No. 4180/2020 (Triveni Prasad Mishra & Others v. The State of M.P. & Ors.) decided on 18.06.2020 setting aside the impugned order granting liberty to the respondents to pass appropriate order in accordance with law, if they so desire.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Dwivedi - Full Document
1