Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 131 (0.32 seconds)
Documents citing Harish Kumar & Anr vs State Of M.P on 9 July, 1996

Harish vs The State Of M.P. on 17 January, 2019

The information about the seizure and the recovery of contraband and the entire episode was informed to the higher authorities SDOP and the SDM and the same has been established from the statement of the witnesses and therefore, there was a compliance of the provisions as contained under Section 42(2) of the HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE Criminal Appeal No.1350/2005 (Harish and Another Vs. State of M. P.) -4- Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The appellants were also informed about their rights keeping in view Section 50 of the Act.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Harish vs State Of M.P. on 17 March, 2021

(vi) the concerned jail authorities are directed that before releasing the applicant, the medical examination of the applicant be conducted through the jail doctor and if it is prima facie found that he is having any symptoms of 1 M.Cr.C.No.3104/2021 (Harish Vs. State of M.P.) COVID-19, then the consequential follow up action or any further test required be undertaken immediately. If not, the applicant shall be released on bail in terms of the conditions imposed in this order;
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - R Arya - Full Document

Harish vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 October, 2022

(Harish Vs. State of M.P.) It is directed that subject to depositing the fine amount, if already not deposited, he shall be released on bail, on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) along with solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court, for his appearance before the Registry of this Court firstly on 12.12.2022, and on such other dates, as may be fixed by the Registry in this regard, till final disposal of this appeal.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - S K Singh - Full Document

Harish vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 17 May, 2019

7. By way of abundant caution, it is further directed that the applicant shall also mark his presence in the concerned police station on every Sunday of week between 10.00 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE M.Cr.C.No.20411/2019 (Harish Vs. State of M.P.) -1- a.m. to 12.00 noon during the investigation. Any default in attendance and marking his presence in the concerned police station, would result in cancellation of bail granted by this Court, thereby entitling the police to take the applicant in custody immediately.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Divakar Choudhary vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 1 June, 2021

The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has joined investigation and has handed over his phone to the Police. She contends that there is no need for any custodial interrogation because nothing remains to be recovered from him. It is also contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has roots in the society and he will not flee from justice. The learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance on a judgment of this Court dated 29.07.2010 in CRL.M.C No.3877/2009 titled as Harish Kumar v. State, wherein in similar circumstances FIR has been quashed by this Court.
Delhi High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - S Prasad - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next