Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.90 seconds)

State vs . Attar Singh on 11 October, 2022

In view of the aforestated law in Appabhai v. State of Gujrat & Kathi Bharat Vasjur v. State of Gujarat (Supra) the prosecution case is not affected due to the absence of the public witnesses. In view of the settled law in Sardul Singh's case (Supra) one has to see the totality of circumstances which in this case point towards the negligence of the accused in commission of the accident.
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Rahul on 20 July, 2024

16. Regarding the fact that the crane was at a slow speed and therefore, the accused cannot be said to be rash and negligent, it is noted that it is not necessary that speed of the vehicle will only determine that whether a person/ driver is rash or negligent. Reliance is placed on the judgment of Ravi Kapoor Vs. State of Rajasthan AIR 2012,SC 2986 in which the Hon'ble Appex Court held:
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Maktumhussain S/O Gudusab Taralagatta vs The State By Cpi on 11 March, 2025

17. Taking note of the principles of law enunciated by the Hon'ble Court in the case of Ravi Kapoor v. State of Rajasthan reported in AIR 2012 SC 2986, in the absence of any explanation offered by the accused, learned Trial Judge recorded an order of conviction holding that accused is responsible for the accidental death of Shivabasappa in the road traffic accident involving three wheeler vehicle bearing No.KA.25.B.1070 is just and proper.
Karnataka High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - V Srishananda - Full Document
1