Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 33 (0.91 seconds)
Documents citing Hukam Chand Gupta vs Director General, I.C.A.R. & Ors on 25 September, 2012

Uttar Pradesh Nursing Assistants ... vs Director General Medical Health And ... on 31 January, 2019

In Hukam Chand Gupta vs. Director General, I.C.A.R. and Ors. AIR 2013 SC 547, the Court observed that in order to attract doctrine of "equal pay for equal work", assessment of the nature and quality of duties performed and responsibilities shouldered by the incumbents is necessary. Even if, the two persons are working on two posts having same nomenclature, it would not lead to the necessary inference that the posts are identical in every manner.
Allahabad High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - S Agarwal - Full Document

Dr. Gita Rani Rastogi And Others vs The Authorised Controller Meerut ... on 9 September, 2019

In Hukam Chand Gupta vs. Director General, I.C.A.R. and Ors. AIR 2013 SC 547, Court observed that in order to attract doctrine of "equal pay for equal work", assessment of the nature and quality of duties performed and responsibilities shouldered by the incumbents is necessary. Even if, the two persons are working on two posts having same nomenclature, it would not lead to the necessary inference that the posts are identical in every manner.
Allahabad High Court Cites 46 - Cited by 0 - S Agarwal - Full Document

Harish Chandra Shukla vs State Of U.P. And Others on 27 January, 2020

In Hukam Chand Gupta vs. Director General, I.C.A.R. and Ors. AIR 2013 SC 547, the Court observed that in order to attract doctrine of "equal pay for equal work", assessment of the nature and quality of duties performed and responsibilities shouldered by the incumbents is necessary. Even if, the two persons are working on two posts having same nomenclature, it would not lead to the necessary inference that the posts are identical in every manner.
Allahabad High Court Cites 38 - Cited by 1 - S Agarwal - Full Document

Ramesh Chandra And Others vs State Of U.P. And Others on 24 February, 2020

In Hukam Chand Gupta vs. Director General, I.C.A.R. and Ors. AIR 2013 SC 547, the Court observed that in order to attract doctrine of "equal pay for equal work", assessment of the nature and quality of duties performed and responsibilities shouldered by the incumbents is necessary. Even if, the two persons are working on two posts having same nomenclature, it would not lead to the necessary inference that the posts are identical in every manner.
Allahabad High Court Cites 49 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

Anil Kumar And Another vs India Airlines Through Chairman And 3 ... on 12 August, 2014

In Hukam Chand Gupta vs. Director General, I.C.A.R. and Ors. AIR 2013 SC 547, the Court observed that in order to attract doctrine of "equal pay for equal work", assessment of the nature and quality of duties performed and responsibilities shouldered by the incumbents is necessary. Even if, the two persons are working on two posts having same nomenclature, it would not lead to the necessary inference that the posts are identical in every manner.
Allahabad High Court Cites 66 - Cited by 0 - S Agarwal - Full Document

R. Thiagarajan vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 27 February, 2014

49. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the decision reported in 2012 (10) SCALE 479 (Hukum Chand Gupta v. Director General, ICAR and others), held that it is for the employer to categorize the posts and to prescribe the duties of each post. There cannot be any straitjacket formula for holding that two posts having the same nomenclature would have to be given the same pay scale. Prescription of pay scales on particular posts is a very complex exercise which can be assessed by expert bodies like employer or Pay Commission and Courts would not normally venture to substitute its own opinion for the opinions rendered by the experts, as it lacks necessary expertise.
Madras High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 2 - N N Vasanthakumar - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next