Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.28 seconds)
Documents citing The State Of Karnataka Through Mahagaon ... vs Dasharath on 24 June, 2009

Marlingappa S/O Basavaraj Chikkabudur vs The State Through C.P.I Shahapur on 15 September, 2020

21. Accordingly, the judgment and order of the learned Sessions Court at Yadgiri in S.C.No.35/2011 dated 06.01.2012 is set aside and the matter is remanded to it to proceed with the case from the stage of recording the statement of appellant keeping in view the observations of this Court in Dasharath's case and decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Nar Singh's case and thereafter shall dispose of the case in accordance with law. Since the case is of the year 2011, learned Sessions Judge shall conclude the entire exercise within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this judgment. The accused-appellant shall remain in judicial custody.
Karnataka High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 1 - K S Dixit - Full Document

The Registrar General vs Doddahanuma @ Hanuma on 22 September, 2017

8. The primary contention of the learned counsel for the appellants is, wrongful recording of the statement of 11 accused under Section 313 of Cr.P.C. In support of their case, reliance is placed on the judgment of this Court reported in ILR 1991 KAR 1542 in the case of STATE VS. DASHARATH, contending that putting questions to an accused must be fair and in a form which even an ignorant or illiterate person will be able to appreciate and understand. Therefore, it is imperative that the questions put to an accused must be couched in simple language and must be specific, only then the accused would be able to understand the case sought to be made against him. On failure to do so, the matter requires to be re-considered by the Trial Court.
Karnataka High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1