Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (1.28 seconds)
Documents citing Depot Superintendent H.P.Corpn. Ltd. & ... vs Kolhapur Agri. Market Commtt. Kolhapur on 20 June, 2007

United India Insurance Co. Ltd vs Manubhai Dharmasinhbhai Gajera & Ors on 16 May, 2008

46. As a proposition of law, where a renewal is based on mutual consent, there may be no automatic renewal as has also been held by this Court in Depot Supdt., H.P. Corporation Ltd. v. Kolhapur Agricultural Market Committee [(2007) 6 SCC 159] but as would be discussed hereinafter, a mediclaim policy where a senior citizen is involved would stand somewhat on a different footing. It will depend upon the contract entered into between the parties and the statutes operating in the field as also constitutional scheme. We do not agree with the submission of the learned Solicitor General that wherever renewal is subject to mutual consent to the parties, a State may at its whims and caprice refuse to renew.
Supreme Court of India Cites 43 - Cited by 80 - Full Document

M/S.Hindustan Petroleum vs Angammal (Deceased) on 5 October, 2010

The issue to be decided in KOLHAPUR AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE's case (2007) 6 SCC 159) was whether the appellants were entitled to have automatic renewal or continuance of the lease in the absence of any material showing such desire on the part of the Central Government. Therefore in the backdrop of the interpretation of the Statues, I shall approach the facts of the present case and examine the submissions and the counter submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side.
Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - R Subbiah - Full Document

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd vs Ajay Bhatia on 24 November, 2021

9. The learned Single Judge of this Court vide order dated 21.11.2013 in CS(OS) No.1828/2006 also held to the effect that the statement made in paragraph 9 of the written statement that the lease came to an end on 31st March 2009 was an admission by Defendant No. 1 that its continuance in the suit property beyond that date is without any legal basis with there being observations also in the order dated 21.11.2013 to the effect that there was no automatic renewal of the lease and the defendant no.1 had not exercised any such right earlier by issuing any notice to the plaintiff and that as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited v. Rama Chandrashekhar Vaidya", a decision dated 2nd April 2013 in SLP (Civil) No. 15 of 2010, the Hon'ble Supreme Court had negatived the plea in that case by Defendant No. 1 thereof that there was an automatic renewal of the lease, likewise, in "Depot Superintendent, H.P. Corporation Limited v. Kolhapur Agricultural Market Committee, Kolhapur" (2007) 6 SCC 159, the Supreme Court had held that there was no automatic renewal of a lease for a petroleum retail outlet and thus, it was held that the plaintiff was entitled under Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SUMIT GHAI Signing Date:24.11.2021 11:58:31 This file is EX.F.A.13/2019 & EX.F.A.30/2019 Page 9 of 31 digitally signed by PS to HMJ ANU MALHOTRA.
Delhi High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - A Malhotra - Full Document

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. vs Ajay Bhatia on 22 September, 2022

Similarly, the Supreme Court has, in Depot Superintendent, H.P. Corporation Limited v. Kolhapur Agricultural Market Committee, Kolhapur (2007) 6 SCC 159, held that there is no automatic renewal of a lease for a petroleum retail outlet. Consequently, the statement made in para 9 of the written statement that the lease came to an end on 31 st March 2009 is an admission by Defendant No.1 that its continuance in the suit property beyond that date is without any legal basis.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 1 - I Banerjee - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd. vs I.A.S. Officers Association & Ors. on 8 October, 2014

50. As a proposition of law, where a renewal is based on mutual consent, there may be no automatic renewal as has also been held by this Court in H.P. Corpn. Ltd. V. Kolhapur Agricultural Market Committee but as would be discussed hereinafter; a mediclaim policy where a senior citizen is involved would stand somewhat on a different footing.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1