Sri Babul Chandra Debnath vs The State Of Tripura on 25 July, 2024
[56] In Harivadan Babubhai Patel v. State of Gujarat, reported in
(2013) 7 SCC 45, the Hon‟ble Apex Court observed thus:
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 108 (0.95 seconds)Documents citing
Harivadan Babubhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat on 1 July, 2013
Nur Mohammad Khadim (Aged 60 Years) vs State Of Tripura on 25 March, 2026
[46] In Harivadan Babubhai Patel v. State of Gujarat, reported in
(2013) 7 SCC 45, the Hob'ble Apex Court observed thus:
Simran Pal Singh vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 8 January, 2015
In Harivadan Babubhai Patel vs. State of
Gujarat, (2013) 7 SCC 45, Hon'ble Supreme Court of
.
State vs Mohan Kukreja on 7 August, 2025
PW-4 claimed prior complaints were made but provided no documentary evidence
(cross-examination, 24.04.2019). The defense correctly argues that this delay,
coupled with the absence of corroboration, raises doubts about the prosecution's
case, as held in Harivadan Babubhai Patel v. State of Gujarat (2013) 7 SCC 45,
where unexplained delay was deemed fatal absent credible justification.
Sri Joy Kumar Reang vs The State Of Tripura on 12 June, 2020
[37] We have noted that the learned trial court
did not reach the conclusion of guilt of the appellant
merely on the basis of the evidence of last seen
together. While appreciating the evidence the learned
trial court also referred to and appreciated the other
incriminating circumstances available on record
against the accused appellant and came to the
conclusion of his guilt after recording its finding that
all the links in the chain of circumstances were
proved. The learned trial court also derived support
from the decisions of the Apex Court in Harivadan
Babubhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat reported in (2013)
7 SCC 45 and Madhu alias Madhuranatha & Anr. Vs.
Page 39 of 56
State of Karnataka reported in (2014) 12 SCC 419 for
drawing up the conclusion.
Bhushan vs State on 7 September, 2018
In Harivadan Babubhai Patel vs. State of Gujarat (2013) 7 SCC 45, Court observed as under:-
Purshottam Rai vs State Of U.P. on 7 September, 2018
In Harivadan Babubhai Patel Vs. State of Gujrat, (2013) 7 SCC 45, the Supreme Court held as under:
The State Of Maharashtra vs Atul Rama Lote on 25 April, 2019
She also draws support from Harivadan Babubhai Patel vs. State of
16 (1999) 4 SCC 370
17 (2002) 1 SCC 622
18 2005 Cri.L.J. 3732
20/39
::: Uploaded on - 25/04/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 26/04/2019 04:12:08 :::
nilegaonkar Confirmation Case No. 5-2016-final.odt
Gujarat19, Ronny @ Ronald James Alwaris and Ors. vs. State of
Maharashtra20, and Charandas Swami vs. State of Gujrat and Ors. 21,
to explain how there is no delay in lodging of FIR or any error under
section 313 examination or in matters of identification of accused in Court.
She also states that there is no delay in sending FIR to Court.
State vs (1) Prince Kochar, on 30 May, 2019
See: Harivardan Babubhai Patel v.
State of Gujarat 3 (2013) 7 SCC."
Rajesh vs State Of U.P. on 20 September, 2019
In Harivadan Babubhai Patel vs. State of Gujarat (2013) 7 SCC 45, Court observed as under:-