4. It was further urged before the learned Judge by the writ petitioner
that the notice was not properly served on her. The learned Judge held that
this was a disputed question of fact which the Court does not need to go
into since the learned Judge found the notice to be stigmatic. The learned
Judge referred to the decision of a Division Bench of this Court in the case
of Ujjal Mondal v. State of West Bengal, reported in 2013 (1) CHN (CAL)
3
458 as also to the decision of this Court in the case of Sourendra Nath
Das v. The State of West Bengal & Ors. (WPA 11903 of 2021).