Inquiry Act, 1932 to inquire into allegations
of corruption, favouritism and nepotism against the Chief
Minister of a State-Suit filed by the State under ... extent of a legal right
depends.
A memorandum alleging corruption, favouritism and nepotism
against the Chief Minister of the State of Karnataka was
submitted
matter could be accorded, a spate of complaints containing allegations of favouritism, nepotism, corruption and mal- practices with regard to the selection process, in general ... came to be made to the Director General, CISF about the favoritism, nepotism and other mal-practices as well as corruption in the selection
since they were guilty of
favouritism, nepotism and political patronage in the selection
conducted, to cancel the select list, and to conduct a fresh
selection ... Ayukta found that the selection was
vitiated by favouritism and nepotism and corrupt practices and
the select list should be set aside.
14. The report
Aavin throughout the state, just before elections completely tainted.
Arbitrariness and nepotism are writ large on the face of the selections.
Many of the applicants ... When there is ample proof before the
authorities that there was rampant nepotism in making appointments
throughout the State, a decision was taken
Sarika Chaudhary & Anr. vs State on 20 September, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
Swati Maliwal vs State on 20 September, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT
liable to be quashed and set
aside as it is vitiated by nepotism, favouritism, malafides,
arbitrariness, extraneous consideration and violative of Articles ... submitted that the
fact that it is tainted and vitiated by nepotism and favouritism
is clearly born out from the relationship and acquaintance of most
said writ petitions were dismissed holding that there was no arbitrariness, nepotism or favoritism or mal-practices in conducting the selection of the Police Constable ... several unsuccessful candidates, but the grounds with regard to irregularity, illegality, nepotism and favoritism did not find favour with the Court. This being so, there
fairly and honestly and the selections made were
vitiated on account of nepotism, favouritism and casteism
and also political motivation. The appellants, however,
submitted that ... selections were made fairly and
honestly and they were not tainted by nepotism, favouritism,
casteism or political patronage, besides there was nothing
to show that
Akhil Bhartiya Upbhokta Congress vs Staet Of M.P. & Ors on 6 April, 2011
