Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.56 seconds)
Documents citing M/S Zee Telefilms Ltd. & Anr vs Union Of India & Ors on 2 February, 2005

Deepak Kumar vs The Bses Yamuna Power Ltd on 6 July, 2024

Ltd (M/s) v. Union of India 2012 LLR 245, it is submitted by him that even though there is no notification under Section 10(1) of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 abolishing the contract labour in the establishments similar to the establishments run by the Management no. 1, this Court has the jurisdiction to determine whether the contracts purportedly awarded by the management in favour of the alleged contractors i.e. Managements no. 2 to 4 were really camouflage or sham.
Delhi District Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Gad Industries vs M/S Syndicate Bank on 4 February, 2011

.VV("3"ounsel for the respondent is right and justified in lV"'i.._""p'laic'iEng reliance on the judgment in the case of M/S. "jrRANscoRE vs UNION or INDIA & ANR. --- AIR 2007 so 712, While contending that the perzdericy of the original applicatiorl 'NP 4-.492--93/20] ] i\i'o.E386/2010 is no bar to the bank to initiate proceedings uridei' the Act'. Therefore, I do not find any f1'1€3I'i§.VV"f.I'iV~.fiE.11€5 eoritentions oi' the petitioners. Howevei", in this'p«sif*t:.i_€§u};if' _ ease, the fact remains that the bank has I}10'v*€(i.:'t.hé'~.:Df.s1£'itE1" » Magistrate and has obtained an order for poiiee .;ji'oi':eiei;isongt=:} take over possession of the prope1'ties. "Vt'hi's" Court 1;iiif£1f3 Of V L. preiimiriary" hearing has gratnteti'Vi'i'i:if1tetim the parties to maintaiii Sfimiortgie 1, is not extended to eriabie the the Appeilate Tribunal and see}-{i'ieeZess2i=Ai"y the petitioners to serious har5fish,i;'1iiiafifii-.prejiidiee..,,rTh.erefore, in my considered view, thisflis 21 'fit e'as:'e--,_to .seX'teiici the interim order directing the parties to mairifgairi statusqii_o with regard to the possession of _ the petitionit isehed'uieV:piop:r:1*ty, for a period of four weeks. '.'r'=.t Le2ifi2.ed..CQtir}seI. for the petitioners has placed reliance ._ on t.}1Ae'j'udgr_nevi5;1;of the Apex Court in. the ease of M/S. SARDAR .;1;s_soom"zes;_ & 0123 vs. PUNJAB & SINDH BANK & ons. -- AIR ISQ 218. to eonterid that the gu.ide}i.nes issued by the 'fiiesegve Bank of India regarding One Time Settlemerit, scheme it be eiiforcted in terms of the provis.i.ons of 2002 Act. it is not f1€C€fSSE1I.'V to examine this aspect of the matter as it is Very eiear WP 4491} 93 /20 .1. E that the pet'.iiii0r1ers have Elakezz up 2: eor1teni,ior1 beifere the Tribuxxal {hat their plea ibr One Time Seitieziient »rj:d:ifoee'{i C()}}.SiCif;'1'E";'d. 11 is open "£40 t.I'1ei11 to "urge this groundwgis in 'the ' appeal; to be filed.
Karnataka High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - P B Sanganagouda - Full Document

Ram Briksh Prasad vs The Khadi & Village Industries on 28 April, 2010

We have also gone through the pleadings of the writ application. It only states that Nalanda Zila Khadi Gramodyog Sangh was created after the decentralization of the Bihar Khadi Gramudyog Sangh which was registered under the Societies Registration Act. It had direct nexus with the Khadi and Villlage Industries Commission constituted by an act of Parliament. To classify it as a 'State' under Article 12 of the Constitution of India something more was required including the financial administration, disciplinary control etc. The essential 3 attributes of a body being declared as a 'State' have been noticed in AIR 2005 SC 2677( M/S Zee Telefilms Ltd versus Union of India) at paragraph 21 as follows:-
Patna High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - N Sinha - Full Document
1