Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.24 seconds)

Ratheesh K vs State Of Kerala on 1 July, 2016

In that view of the matter, I set aside Ext.P9 and direct the 2nd respondent to re- consider the permission sought for by the petitioners in accordance with law and in terms of the judgment referred (supra) in [Latheefa E. v. State of Kerala and Others, (2013 (2) KHC 183)], and a decision shall be taken at the earliest and at any rate, within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Kerala High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S P Chaly - Full Document

Unknown vs Present on 27 March, 2018

7. Learned counsel for the petitioners has invited my attention to the judgment of this Court in 'Latheefa E' (supra), wherein it is held that, if application and its enclosures submitted by the donor meets the requirements laid down in the Act, it has to be considered properly, and minor contradictions in statements will not be fatal when there is no W.P.(C) No.12171 of 2018 5 concrete material to doubt the correctness of claim of the parties that they are close family friends. The order passed by the Authorization Committee was interfered with therein, and directed to re-consider the issue and take a decision in accordance with law. Following the said judgment, in W.P.(C) No.31199 of 2016, this Court has rendered a judgment dated 29.09.2016, interfering with the order passed by the Authorization Committee and issued directions to re-consider the matter.
Kerala High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S P Chaly - Full Document
1