Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.57 seconds)

Union Of India And Ors vs Union Of India & Others (Supra) on 18 November, 2014

8. The question remains to be answered is as to whether the applicant is entitled to be placed in the HS Grade II w.e.f. 24.2.1997 or w.e.f. 15.10.1984. Even though the respondents have now taken a plea that the applicant in the category of instrument repairer could be given higher grades according to the percentage of vacancies and seniority but this plea was not taken by the respondents in the earlier O.A. filed by the applicant. Once the applicant was equated with the applicants in the O.A. in the case of Dhian Singh vs. Union of India & others (supra), obviously he became entitled to the benefits flowing from the said order to the extent that applicant has to be granted benefit of HS Grade II w.e.f. 15.10.1984. The issue stands settled in favour of the applicant and cannot now be re-opened.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 33 - T Rabstan - Full Document

Uoi.Th.Ministry Of Defence And Ors. vs Dharam Chand Sharma on 18 November, 2014

"8. The question remains to be answered is as to whether the applicant is entitled to be placed in the HS Grade II w.e.f. 24.2.1997 or w.e.f. 15.10.1984. Even though the respondents have now taken a plea that the applicant in the category of instrument repairer could be given higher grades according to the percentage of vacancies and seniority but this plea was not taken by the respondents in the earlier O.A. filed by the applicant. Once the applicant was equated with the applicants in the O.A. in the case of Dhian Singh vs. Union of India & others (supra), obviously he became entitled to the benefits flowing from the said order to the extent that applicant has to be granted benefit of HS Grade II w.e.f. 15.10.1984. The issue stands settled in favour of the applicant and cannot now be re-opened.
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - T Rabstan - Full Document
1