Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 62 (0.83 seconds)
Documents citing C.C.E., Raigad vs M/S. Ispat Metallics Industries ... on 6 May, 2016

India Cements Limited vs Medchal - G S T on 1 February, 2023

It was clarified that by way of general principle as regards determination of place of removal, the principle laid down by the Apex Court in the case of CCE vs Ispat Industries Ltd. may be applied wherein the Apex Court have reiterated the principle laid down in Escorts JCB Ltd. to the extent that place of removal is required to be determined with reference to point of sale, with the condition that place of removal ( premises) has to be referred with reference to the premises of the manufacturer. Para 16 of the ruling of Ispat Industries was reproduced, which reads as follows:
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri Chakra Cement Ltd vs Visakhapatnam G S T on 1 February, 2023

8.2 of its circular No. 97/8/2007-CX dated 23.8.2007. It was clarified that by way of general principle as regards determination of place of removal, the principle laid down by the Apex Court in the case of CCE vs Ispat Industries Ltd. may be applied wherein the Apex Court have reiterated the principle laid down in Escorts JCB Ltd. to the extent that place of removal is required to be determined with reference to point of sale, with the condition that place of removal ( premises) has to be referred with reference to the premises of the manufacturer. Para 16 of the ruling of Ispat Industries was reproduced, which reads as follows:
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Commissioner Of Central Tax ... vs M/S Myhome Industries Private Ltd on 28 November, 2022

It was clarified that by way of general principle as regards determination of place of removal, the principle laid down by the Apex Court in the case of CCE vs Ispat Industries Ltd. may be applied wherein the Apex Court have reiterated the principle laid down in Escorts JCB Ltd. to the extent that place of removal is required to be determined with reference to point of sale, with the condition that place of removal ( premises) has to be referred with reference to the premises of the manufacturer. Para 16 of the ruling of Ispat Industries was reproduced, which reads as follows:
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

My Home Industries Pvt Ltd vs Visakhapatnam - G S T on 28 November, 2022

It was clarified that by way of general principle as regards determination of place of removal, the principle laid down by the Apex Court in the case of CCE vs Ispat Industries Ltd. may be applied wherein the Apex Court have reiterated the principle laid down in Escorts JCB Ltd. to the extent that place of removal is required to be determined with reference to point of sale, with the condition that place of removal ( premises) has to be referred with reference to the premises of the manufacturer. Para 16 of the ruling of Ispat Industries was reproduced, which reads as follows:
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

My Home Industries Pvt Ltd vs Rangareddy - G S T on 28 November, 2022

It was clarified that by way of general principle as regards determination of place of removal, the principle laid down by the Apex Court in the case of CCE vs Ispat Industries Ltd. may be applied wherein the Apex Court have reiterated the principle laid down in Escorts JCB Ltd. to the extent that place of removal is required to be determined with reference to point of sale, with the condition that place of removal ( premises) has to be referred with reference to the premises of the manufacturer. Para 16 of the ruling of Ispat Industries was reproduced, which reads as follows:
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

My Home Industries Pvt Ltd vs Visakhapatnam - G S T on 28 November, 2022

It was clarified that by way of general principle as regards determination of place of removal, the principle laid down by the Apex Court in the case of CCE vs Ispat Industries Ltd. may be applied wherein the Apex Court have reiterated the principle laid down in Escorts JCB Ltd. to the extent that place of removal is required to be determined with reference to point of sale, with the condition that place of removal ( premises) has to be referred with reference to the premises of the manufacturer. Para 16 of the ruling of Ispat Industries was reproduced, which reads as follows:
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The India Cements Limited vs Rangareddy - G S T on 1 February, 2023

It was clarified that by way of general principle as regards determination of place of removal, the principle laid down by the Apex Court in the case of CCE vs Ispat Industries Ltd. may be applied wherein the Apex Court have reiterated the principle laid down in Escorts JCB Ltd. to the extent that place of removal is required to be determined with reference to point of sale, with the condition that place of removal ( premises) has to be referred with reference to the premises of the manufacturer. Para 16 of the ruling of Ispat Industries was reproduced, which reads as follows:
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next