Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.25 seconds)

Omkar Singh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 20 October, 2017

In support of this contention, Shri Adhikari, learned senior counsel for the petitioner relied on 2012 (2) MPLJ 90 (Maya Choudhary Vs. State of M.P. and others). It is submitted that when later on, the learned Collector intended to proceed against the petitioner under Section 40 of the Adhiniyam and sufficient time was not granted to the petitioner to file reply, the petitioner filed W.P. No.4687/2017 before this Court. This Court by order dated 19.04.2017 (Annexure-P/12) permitted the respondents to proceed with the proceedings initiated under Section 40 of the Adhiniyam, but restrained them to pass a final order till next date of hearing. It is fairly submitted that although on the next date of hearing, nobody appeared for the petitioner in the said case and stay was not continued for this reason, the stay was not specifically vacated by this Court. In nutshell, it is prayed that the impugned order may be stayed.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 5 - Full Document
1