Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.46 seconds)
Documents citing U.N. Pai, A. Majumdar And M.L. Varudkar vs State Of Gujarat on 13 December, 2000

V.P.Mittal vs State Of Gujarat on 21 January, 2021

[1.7] According to the petitioner, the University, being autonomous body, is empowered to frame the Rules /conditions of service of its employees and there is no need to get approval from the State Government. For the said purpose, he has relied on the communication addressed by the Registrar of the University dated 09.10.2004 addressed to the Page 5 of 20 Downloaded on : Tue Aug 31 23:27:05 IST 2021 C/SCA/14748/2005 JUDGMENT Secretary, Agriculture and Cooperation Department, Sachivalaya, Gandhinagar whereby it is stated that the Rules framed by it for considering the prior services rendered by its employees with other State Governments is to be counted as continuous service for the purpose of pension does not need any approval. However, in view of the decision rendered by this Court in the case of V.A. Vadukar Vs. State of Gujarat rendered in Special Civil Application No.9467 of 1998, as also in view of Sections 23(1) and 26(1) of the Gujarat Agricultural University Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act, 1969'), the Board of Management of the University is empowered to frame the Rules /conditions of service of its employees, which is not requiring any approval of the State Government under the 'Act, 1969', and therefore, it was requested that the exercise undertaken for the approval of those Rules becomes redundant.
Gujarat High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - U A Trivedi - Full Document

V.P.Mittal vs State Of Gujarat on 21 January, 2021

[1.7] According to the petitioner, the University, being autonomous body, is empowered to frame the Rules /conditions of service of its employees and there is no need to get approval from the State Government. For the said purpose, he has relied on the communication addressed by the Registrar of the University dated 09.10.2004 addressed to the Page 5 of 20 Downloaded on : Wed Jan 12 03:55:19 IST 2022 C/SCA/14748/2005 JUDGMENT Secretary, Agriculture and Cooperation Department, Sachivalaya, Gandhinagar whereby it is stated that the Rules framed by it for considering the prior services rendered by its employees with other State Governments is to be counted as continuous service for the purpose of pension does not need any approval. However, in view of the decision rendered by this Court in the case of V.A. Vadukar Vs. State of Gujarat rendered in Special Civil Application No.9467 of 1998, as also in view of Sections 23(1) and 26(1) of the Gujarat Agricultural University Act, 1969 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act, 1969'), the Board of Management of the University is empowered to frame the Rules /conditions of service of its employees, which is not requiring any approval of the State Government under the 'Act, 1969', and therefore, it was requested that the exercise undertaken for the approval of those Rules becomes redundant.
Gujarat High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - U A Trivedi - Full Document

Purav vs State on 30 April, 2012

The decision relied on by learned senior advocate for the applicant in the case of Ravindra Kumar Madhanlal Goenka & Anr. v. M/s. Rugmini Ram Raghav Spinners P. Ltd., [2009 CRI. L.J. 2852] was in the factual backdrop of the case that full payment was made by the party but the goods were not dispatched and in the case of M.V. Majmudar v. State of Gujarat [2011 (0) GLHEL-HC 226376] where in view of premediated conspiracy consignment was delivered to consignee without being presented bill of lading and thus criminal breach of trust was committed.
Gujarat High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A S Dave - Full Document

Purav Atulbhai Shah ­ vs State Of Gujarat & 1 ­ on 11 April, 2012

The decision relied on by learned senior advocate for the applicant  in   the   case   of  Ravindra   Kumar   Madhanlal   Goenka   &   Anr.   v.   M/s.   Rugmini Ram Raghav Spinners P. Ltd., [2009 CRI. L.J. 2852] was in the  factual backdrop of the case that full payment was made by the party but  the  goods  were   not  dispatched  and  in  the  case  of  M.V. Majmudar v.  State   of   Gujarat   [2011   (0)   GLHEL­HC   226376]  where   in   view   of  premediated conspiracy consignment was delivered to consignee without  being   presented   bill   of   lading   and   thus   criminal   breach   of   trust   was  committed.
Gujarat High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A S Dave - Full Document
1