Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.69 seconds)
Documents citing Karam Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 29 January, 1996

Bhairu Singh vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 28 July, 2003

15. In Deputy Director of Collegiate Education (Admn.) v. S. Nagoor Meera (7), the Supreme Court has considered the controversy whether, when the accused is convicted by the criminal court, the disciplinary authority would still await the outcome of the case. The Apex Court opined that once the accused was convicted, it forms basis for taking the action under proviso to Article 311(2) of the Constitution, which will, however, be subject to ultimate result of the prosecution case. In the event the case ends in favour of the accused and honourably gets acquitted, then the authorities are required to reconsider the order of removal. That ratio also does not help the petitioner since he has already been convicted for the offences he was charged with and it is a disqualification though he was released on probation. The same view has been reiterated in Union of India (UOI) v. Bakshi Ram (8), Karam Singh v. State of Punjab and Anr. (9), and Addl.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - H R Panwar - Full Document
1   2 3 Next