Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.72 seconds)
Documents citing Poonam Datta vs Krishanlal Datta And Ors. on 11 October, 1988

Israr Ahmad vs Azazul Hussain Ahmad & Anr. on 20 December, 2019

15. Mr. Sawant, however, contended that in the event of this Court not accepting the father's version, the father would, at least, be entitled to access to the child on week-ends and during vacations. The father is living at Miraj and the mother is at Sangli. I see no difficulty in permitting the father to meet the child on week-ends or during vacations. Both the spouses are available on phone in their respective offices. It would be in the interest of the child if the father informs the mother in advance and meets the child either at week-ends or during vacation. I am reminded of the caution sounded by the Supreme Court in Poonam Datta's case, reported at 1989 Supp (1) SCC 587 : AIR 1989 SC 401 (supra). I can do no better than to reproduce Para 7 of the decision of the Supreme Court in that case at page 402 of the Report--
Allahabad High Court Cites 53 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Surabhai Ravikumar Minawala vs State Of Gujarat on 24 September, 2004

8. Before we conclude this judgment, we may deal with the alternative submission of Mr. Nanavati that in the event of our holding in favour of the petitioner, direction may be given that for 15 days in a month the custody of the child be given to respondent no. 2 who will go to Bombay and bring the child at his own expense. It is also submitted that during Ganesh Utsav, which is presently going on, the custody of the child be given to respondent no. 2 for a period of 15 days. This submission has been opposed by Mr. Naik, as in his submission, that may create complications and the child will be shunted between the two families every 15 days. The decision relied on by Mr. Nanavati for this purpose is in the case of Poonam Datta [supra] and it is distinguished by Mr. Naik by saying that if the father so desired he could come to Bombay and meet the child, so also the other family members, because unlike the case before the Apex Court where it was aged grand parent, these persons are in the position to go to Bombay and meet the child. We are afraid that we cannot accept the alternative submission of Mr. Nanavati, but we find some substance in the submission or Mr. Naik because such a direction would unnecessarily toss the child like shuttlecock between the two families that would adversely affect health of the child at this tender age and mentally also it will not able to adjust in either of the families. In this very decision it has been laid down by the Apex Court that parties should refrain from doing anything which may adversely affect the child physically or mentally.
Gujarat High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 10 - Full Document

Bal Krishan Rastogi S/O Shyam Behari ... vs Dr. (Ms.) Reena Rastogi D/O Vijay Pal ... on 10 November, 2004

12. The next authority cited by the learned counsel for the respondent is Poonam Datta v. Krishanlal Datta and Ors., in which the court on the facts of that case issued direction that child will live with his mother, however, permitted child's grandfather to take child to his residence during every weekend and further directed parties to do nothing which would be adverse to interest of child. The said direction was issued on the facts of that case.
Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 3 - K N Sinha - Full Document

Abdulsattar Husen Kudachikar vs Mrs. Shahina, Abdulsattar Kudachikar on 22 September, 1995

15. Mr. Sawant, however, contended that in the event of this Court not accepting the father's version, the father would, at least, be entitled to access to the child on week-ends and during vacations. The father is living at Miraj and the mother is at Sangli. I see no difficulty in permitting the father to meet the child on week-ends or during vacations. Both the spouses are available on phone in their respective offices. It would be in the interest of the child if the father informs the mother in advance and meets the child either at weekends or during vacation. I am reminded of the caution sounded by the Supreme Court in Poonam Datta's case, reported at (supra). I can do no better than to reproduce Para 7 of the decision of the Supreme Court in that case at page 402 of the Report--
Bombay High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1   2 Next