Ajay Kumar Chaurasia vs Sanjay Kumar Chaurasia on 17 August, 2016
5. On the other hand, learned counsel Mr. Verma
submitted that the decision relied upon by the petitioner is not
applicable in the present case as in the said decision the suit was
of the year 1987. Proviso to Order 6 Rule 17 CPC was not
available in that case, therefore, it was not considered in that
decision. The learned counsel further submitted that the scheme
of the Bihar Building (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1982
does not permit alternative relief for declaration of title and,
therefore, in an eviction suit no amendment for alternative relief
Patna High Court CWJC No.17580 of 2015 (5) dt.17-08-2016
4
for declaration of title that too after closure of evidence of both
the parties and at the stage of argument can be allowed.