Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.56 seconds)
Documents citing The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Rupram Yadav on 1 November, 2011

The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Laxman on 30 September, 2015

Before the Writ Court challenge was made to the order dated 21.08.2012 passed by the Labour Court, Ujjain in Case No.148/2011 Reference ID, whereby the Labour Court had directed the appellants to pay amount of Rs.2,79,438/- (regarding difference of salary from the period 01.01.2006 to 31.12.2010). The Labour Court, while passing the said award, placed reliance on a Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of State of MP v. Rupram Yadav 2012 (1) MPWN 30 age 78 and Writ Petition No.9373/2010 (s) (Executive Engineer, Public Works Department v. Public Works Department Work-charged Labour Union) decided on 10.08.2011.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chief Engineer State Of M.P. And Anr. vs Devi Singh And 4 Others on 14 August, 2024

Before the Writ Court challenge was made to the order dated 21.08.2012 passed by the Labour Court, Ujjain in Case No.148/2011 Reference ID, whereby the Labour Court had directed the appellants to pay amount of Rs.2,79,438/- (regarding difference of salary from the period 01.01.2006 to 31.12.2010). The Labour Court, while passing the said award, placed reliance on a Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of State of MP v. Rupram Yadav 2012 (1) MPWN 30 page 78 and Writ Petition No.9373/2010 (s) (Executive Engineer, Public Works Department v. Public Works Department Work- charged Labour Union) decided on 10.08.2011.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - P Verma - Full Document

The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Ramchandra on 14 August, 2014

Before the Writ Court challenge was made to the order dated 17.06.2013 passed by the Labour Court, Ujjain in Case No.152/2012 Reference ID, whereby the Labour Court had directed the appellants to pay amount of Rs.2,72,176/- (regarding difference of salary from the period 01.01.2006 to 31.12.2010). The Labour Court, while passing the said award, placed reliance on a Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of State of MP v. Rupram Yadav 2012 (1) MPWN 30 page 78 and Writ Petition No.9373/2010 (s) (Executive Engineer, Public Works Department v. Public Works Department Work- charged Labour Union) decided on 10.08.2011.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Harinarayan on 14 August, 2014

Before the Writ Court challenge was made to the order dated 05.09.2012 passed by the Labour Court, Ujjain in Case No.159/2011 Reference ID, whereby the Labour Court had directed the appellants to pay amount of Rs.1,94,176/- (regarding difference of salary from the period 01.01.2006 to 31.12.2010). The Labour Court, while passing the said award, placed reliance on a Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of State of MP v. Rupram Yadav 2012 (1) MPWN 30 page 78 and Writ Petition No.9373/2010 (s) (Executive Engineer, Public Works Department v. Public Works Department Work- charged Labour Union) decided on 10.08.2011.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Babulal on 14 August, 2014

Before the Writ Court challenge was made to the order dated 21.08.2012 passed by the Labour Court, Ujjain in Case No.137/2011 Reference ID, whereby the Labour Court had directed the appellants to pay amount of Rs.1,94,176/- (regarding difference of salary from the period 01.01.2006 to 31.12.2010). The Labour Court, while passing the said award, placed reliance on a Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of State of MP v. Rupram Yadav 2012 (1) MPWN 30 page 78 and Writ Petition No.9373/2010 (s) (Executive Engineer, Public Works Department v. Public Works Department Work- charged Labour Union) decided on 10.08.2011.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chief Engineer State Of M.P. And Anr. vs Sardar Singh And 5 Others on 28 August, 2014

Before the Writ Court challenge was made to the order dated 21.08.2012 passed by the Labour Court, Ujjain in Case No.148/2011 Reference ID, whereby the Labour Court had directed the appellants to pay amount of Rs.2,79,438/- (regarding difference of salary from the period 01.01.2006 to 31.12.2010). The Labour Court, while passing the said award, placed reliance on a Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of State of MP v. Rupram Yadav 2012 (1) MPWN 30 page 78 and Writ Petition No.9373/2010 (s) (Executive Engineer, Public Works Department v. Public Works Department Workcharged Labour Union) decided on 10.08.2011.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 4 - Full Document

Water Resources Department vs Gangaram on 28 August, 2014

Before the Writ Court challenge was made to the order dated 21.08.2012 passed by the Labour Court, Ujjain in Case No.148/2011 Reference ID, whereby the Labour Court had directed the appellants to pay amount of Rs.2,79,438/- (regarding difference of salary from the period 01.01.2006 to 31.12.2010). The Labour Court, while passing the said award, placed reliance on a Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of State of MP v. Rupram Yadav 2012 (1) MPWN 30 page 78 and Writ Petition No.9373/2010 (s) (Executive Engineer, Public Works Department v. Public Works Department Workcharged Labour Union) decided on 10.08.2011.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Arif Shaikh on 28 August, 2014

Before the Writ Court challenge was made to the order dated 21.08.2012 passed by the Labour Court, Ujjain in Case No.148/2011 Reference ID, whereby the Labour Court had directed the appellants to pay amount of Rs.2,79,438/- (regarding difference of salary from the period 01.01.2006 to 31.12.2010). The Labour Court, while passing the said award, placed reliance on a Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of State of MP v. Rupram Yadav 2012 (1) MPWN 30 page 78 and Writ Petition No.9373/2010 (s) (Executive Engineer, Public Works Department v. Public Works Department Workcharged Labour Union) decided on 10.08.2011.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next