Manoj C.V vs Anzar on 6 July, 2012
In support of the said contention the
learned counsel relied on a decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in
G.Ravindranath v. E.Srinivas and another (2013 ACJ 2131). It is
M.A.C.A.Nos.2269 & 2270 of 2012 11
also contended that no amount was granted by the Tribunal towards
damage to clothing. The learned counsel appearing for the third
respondent submitted that the Tribunal has granted adequate
compensation under all heads as can be seen from the schedule of
compensation given in the impugned award. It is further contended
that the Tribunal cannot be said to have erred in fixing the monthly
income notionally taking into account the failure on the part of the
appellant to establish the contentions regarding occupation and income.
It is further contended that the Tribunal has granted adequate
compensation taking note of the loss of marriage prospects. In short,
according to the learned counsel, the appellant had failed to make out
any ground warranting enhancement of compensation.