Section 12 in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
namely: (a) that the marriage has not been consummated owing to the impotence of the respondent; or (b) that the marriage is in contravention
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 3700 (0.84 seconds)Section 24 in The Special Marriage Act, 1954 [Entire Act]
section 4 has not been fulfilled; or (ii) the respondent was impotent at the time of the marriage and at the time of the institution
Section 2 in Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act 1939 [Entire Act]
obligations for a period of three years; (5) that the husband has impotent at the time of the marriage and continues
Section 19 in Indian Divorce Act, 1869 [Entire Act]
made on any of the following grounds: (1) that the respondent was impotent at the time of the marriage and at the time
Sirajmohmedkhan Janmohamadkhan vs Hafizunnisa Yasinkhan & Anr on 14 September, 1981
Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973-Section (3)-Scope of-
Husband's impotence to have sexual relations with his wife-
Whether a just ground ... maintenance, the Metropolitan Magistrate,
upheld her allegation that the appellant was impotent and
was incapable of having sexual relations with his wife. But
the Magistrate
Section 2 in The Dissolution Of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 [Entire Act]
obligations for a period of three years; (v) that the husband was impotent at the time of the marriage and continues ... from the date of such order that he has ceased to be impotent, and if the husband so satisfies the Court within such period
Rita Nijhawan vs Balakishan Nijhawan on 21 February, 1973
respondent was not able to do sexual intercourse because of his impotency. In 1957 the appellant's cousin sister Shashi came to stay with ... even if it were to be found the respondent is not impotent within the meaning of the Act, yet if it is proved that
Smt. Nirmala Manohar Jagesha vs Manohar Shivram Jagesha on 13 December, 1990
applicable in India today?. If wild, reckless and baseless allegations of impotency and lack of manliness are made in the written statement, can this ... allegation the wife has stated that it was the husband who was impotent and was unable to consummate the marriage
Yuvraj Digvijay Singh vs Yuvrani Pratap Kumari on 2 May, 1969
Conditions
for divorce on grounds of impotence, invincible repugnance
to sexual act and inability to consummate marriage though
neither party proved impotent.
HEADNOTE:
The appellant ... persistent repugnance to the act of
consummation and that she was impotent. The District Judge
and later the High Court concurrently found that neither
impotence
T. Rangaswami vs T. Aravindammal on 10 August, 1956
marriage be dissolved on the ground that the other party was impotent at the time of marriage and continued to be so until the presentation ... petitioner T. Rangaswami is seeking divorce' on the ground of alleged impotence and alleged desertion. He married the respondent Ara-vindammal