United Bank Of India vs Kamlesh Pratap Singh on 6 December, 2016
(ii) The Gujarat High Court upholding the judgment of the single Judge in
Bank of India versus S. Ghanshyambhai Muljibhai Patel, LPA No.
446/2013 decided on 22nd August, 2013;
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.63 seconds)Documents citing
Bank Of India Through Zonal Manager vs Ghanshyambhai Muljibhai Patel on 15 December, 2015
Sherna Jai Engineer vs Bank Of India on 21 July, 2017
9. Bank of India vs. Ghanshyambhai Muljibhai Patel (High
Court of Gujarat in LPA No.446/2013 in Spl. Civil
Application no.8605/2000 with Civil Application
No.3447/2013)
Learned Counsel for the petitioners heavily relied upon the
decision of the Apex Court in case of Shashikala Devi (supra) to
contend that the resignation tendered by the petitioners is in
essence a letter seeking premature retirement. Learned Counsel
therefore prays that the petitioners be granted the benefit of the
PR of 1995.
Mrs. Bana Hoshie Deboo vs Bank Of India on 21 July, 2017
9. Bank of India vs. Ghanshyambhai Muljibhai Patel (High
Court of Gujarat in LPA No.446/2013 in Spl. Civil
Application no.8605/2000 with Civil Application
No.3447/2013)
Learned Counsel for the petitioners heavily relied upon the
decision of the Apex Court in case of Shashikala Devi (supra) to
contend that the resignation tendered by the petitioners is in
essence a letter seeking premature retirement. Learned Counsel
therefore prays that the petitioners be granted the benefit of the
PR of 1995.
Subhash V.Mayekar vs Bank Of India on 21 July, 2017
9. Bank of India vs. Ghanshyambhai Muljibhai Patel (High
Court of Gujarat in LPA No.446/2013 in Spl. Civil
Application no.8605/2000 with Civil Application
No.3447/2013)
Learned Counsel for the petitioners heavily relied upon the
decision of the Apex Court in case of Shashikala Devi (supra) to
contend that the resignation tendered by the petitioners is in
essence a letter seeking premature retirement. Learned Counsel
therefore prays that the petitioners be granted the benefit of the
PR of 1995.
Satish D.Vaidya vs Bank Of India on 21 July, 2017
9. Bank of India vs. Ghanshyambhai Muljibhai Patel (High
Court of Gujarat in LPA No.446/2013 in Spl. Civil
Application no.8605/2000 with Civil Application
No.3447/2013)
Learned Counsel for the petitioners heavily relied upon the
decision of the Apex Court in case of Shashikala Devi (supra) to
contend that the resignation tendered by the petitioners is in
essence a letter seeking premature retirement. Learned Counsel
therefore prays that the petitioners be granted the benefit of the
PR of 1995.
Maya Chandra vs Bank Of India on 21 July, 2017
9. Bank of India vs. Ghanshyambhai Muljibhai Patel (High
Court of Gujarat in LPA No.446/2013 in Spl. Civil
Application no.8605/2000 with Civil Application
No.3447/2013)
Learned Counsel for the petitioners heavily relied upon the
decision of the Apex Court in case of Shashikala Devi (supra) to
contend that the resignation tendered by the petitioners is in
essence a letter seeking premature retirement. Learned Counsel
therefore prays that the petitioners be granted the benefit of the
PR of 1995.
Ramadas R.Nayak vs Bank Of India on 21 July, 2017
9. Bank of India vs. Ghanshyambhai Muljibhai Patel (High
Court of Gujarat in LPA No.446/2013 in Spl. Civil
Application no.8605/2000 with Civil Application
No.3447/2013)
Learned Counsel for the petitioners heavily relied upon the
decision of the Apex Court in case of Shashikala Devi (supra) to
contend that the resignation tendered by the petitioners is in
essence a letter seeking premature retirement. Learned Counsel
therefore prays that the petitioners be granted the benefit of the
PR of 1995.
Vilas A.Deshpande vs Union Bank Of India on 21 July, 2017
9. Bank of India vs. Ghanshyambhai Muljibhai Patel (High
Court of Gujarat in LPA No.446/2013 in Spl. Civil
Application no.8605/2000 with Civil Application
No.3447/2013)
Learned Counsel for the petitioner heavily relied upon the
decision of the Apex Court in case of Shashikala Devi (supra) to
7/21
::: Uploaded on - 21/07/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 22/07/2017 00:31:53 :::
WP 2320-2001.doc
contend the resignation tendered by the petitioner is in essence
a letter seeking premature retirement. Learned Counsel
therefore prays that the petitioner be granted the benefit of the
PR of 1995.
1