Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 64 (0.55 seconds)

Rakesh Yadav vs M.P. Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran ... on 24 June, 2022

In support of his submission, he has placed reliance on Division Bench judgment passed in the case of Managing Director M.P. Pashchim Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company and others Vs. Ashiq Shah and another, 2021(3) MPLJ 532 wherein it has been held that object and purpose of giving compassionate appointment is to provide immediate helping hand to the family in distress to enable it to overcome sudden Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by SAN MUKTA economic crisis because of death of bread winner. Request of compassionate CHANDRASHEKHA R KOUSHAL Date: 2022.06.29 10:35:36 IST appointment and direction thereupon should be reasonable and proximate to 4 time of death of bread winner.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 32 - V K Shukla - Full Document

Devendra Mali vs The State Of Madhy Pradesh on 5 August, 2021

6. The purpose of compassionate appointment is to provide immediate helping hand to the family in distress. If the petitioner can wait for five years, the very purpose of seeking compassionate appointment is frustrated. This Court in WA No.10/2020 (Managing Director, MP Pashchim Kshetra Vidyut Vitram Company and Ors Vs. Ashiq Shah and Anr.) decided on 07.06.2021 opined as under :-
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - S Paul - Full Document

Manoj Kumar Verma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 26 July, 2024

10. A similar view was taken by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Beni Lal Bamney vs. Union of India and others , reported in 2003 (1) MPLJ 342 and in the case of Riazuddin Khan vs. State of M.P. and others , reported in 2005(4) MPLJ 575 and in the case of Managing Director, Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Co. and others vs. Ashiq Shah and another (W.A.No.10 of 2020).
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - V Mishra - Full Document

Santosh Nagle vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 August, 2024

9. A similar view was taken by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Beni Lal Bamney vs. Union of India and others , reported in 2003 (1) MPLJ 342 and in the case of Riazuddin Khan vs. State of M.P. and others , reported in 2005(4) MPLJ 575 and in the case of Managing Director, Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Co. and others vs. Ashiq Shah and another (W.A.No.10 of 2020).
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - V Mishra - Full Document

Nihal Upadhyay vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 28 August, 2024

8. A similar view was taken by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Beni Lal Bamney vs. Union of India and others , reported in 2003 (1) MPLJ 342 and in the case of Riazuddin Khan vs. State of M.P. and others, reported in 2005(4) MPLJ 575 and in the case of Managing Director, Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Co. and others vs. Ashiq Shah and another (W.A.No.10 of 2020).
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - V Mishra - Full Document

Suresh @ Sonu vs Commissioner Thr. on 28 August, 2024

8. A similar view was taken by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Beni Lal Bamney vs. Union of India and others , reported in 2003 (1) MPLJ 342 and in the case of Riazuddin Khan vs. State of M.P. and others , reported in 2005(4) MPLJ 575 and in the case of Managing Director, Signature Not Verified Signed by: ANAND SHRIVASTAVA Signing time: 9/2/2024 11:01:37 AM NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2024:MPHC-GWL:14619 4 WP-3304-2017 Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Co. and others vs. Ashiq Shah and another (W.A.No.10 of 2020).
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - V Mishra - Full Document

Yogesh Vaishnav vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 October, 2024

8. A similar view was taken by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Beni Lal Bamney vs. Union of India and others , reported in 2003 (1) MPLJ 342 and in the case of Riazuddin Khan vs. State of M.P. and Signature Not Verified Signed by: SUSHEEL KUMAR JHARIYA Signing time: 16-10-2024 11:35:53 AM NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2024:MPHC-JBP:51332 4 WP-29743-2024 others, reported in 2005(4) MPLJ 575 and in the case of Managing Director, Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Co. and others vs. Ashiq Shah and another (W.A.No.10 of 2020).
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - V Mishra - Full Document

Shanti Prajapati vs General Manager on 31 January, 2025

9. A similar view was taken by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Beni Lal Bamney vs. Union of India and others , reported in 2003 (1) MPLJ 342 and in the case of Riazuddin Khan vs. State of M.P. and others, reported in 2005(4) MPLJ 575 and in the case of Managing Director, Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Co. and others vs. Ashiq Shah and another (W.A.No.10 of 2020)
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - V Mishra - Full Document

Shailendra Singh Tomar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 4 February, 2025

11. A similar view was taken by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Beni Lal Bamney vs. Union of India and others , reported in 2003 (1) MPLJ 342 and in the case of Riazuddin Khan vs. State of M.P. and others , reported in 2005(4) MPLJ 575 and in the case of Managing Director, Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Co. and others vs. Ashiq Shah and another (W.A.No.10 of 2020).
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - V Mishra - Full Document

Avnish Kumar Pandey vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 10 February, 2025

8. A similar view was taken by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Beni Lal Bamney vs. Union of India and others , reported in 2003 (1) MPLJ 342 and in the case of Riazuddin Khan vs. State of M.P. and others , reported in 2005(4) MPLJ 575 and in the case of Managing Director, Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Co. and others vs. Ashiq Shah and another (W.A.No.10 of 2020).
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - V Mishra - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next