Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.33 seconds)
Documents citing Musammat Altafan vs Ibrahim on 10 July, 1923

Jagdish Lal vs Smt. Shyama Madan And Ors. on 10 November, 1964

15. Reference may here be made to the case of Mt. Altafan v. Ibrahim, AIR 1924 All 116, which bears a resemblance to the instant case in this respect that there too the medical evidence adduced by the parties in regard to the question of impotency appeared to lead to divergent conclusions. The Court had before it two suits under the Mahommadan Law. one in which the wife who had lived with her hus-
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 7 - Full Document

Abdul Azeem vs Fahimunnisa Begum on 18 January, 1967

25. The first submission made by Mr. Kagalkar was that the District Judge had over-looked the rule of Mohammedan Law which was evolved by the Allahabad High Court in at least two decisions. It was pointed to us that in Altafan v. Ibrahim, AIR 1924 All 116, Kanhaiyalal, J. expressed the view that in a suit brought by the wife for the annulment of her marriage on the ground of impotence, the decree nisi should incorporate a direction that the wife should allow full access to the husband at all reasonable times to exercise his marital rights as her husband during a period of one year.
Karnataka High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Jafar Beg And Anr. vs Ujagar Lal on 28 January, 1935

2. This is clearly a finding of fact and cannot be questioned in second appeal. The learned advocate for the appellants however contends that in so far as the relative weight of the opinions of the hand-writing experts was one of the questions in the lower Court, the finding is a mixed one of law and fact. Reliance is placed on Altafan v. Ibrahim 1924 All. 116, at pp. 814 and 815 (of 1923 A.L.J) in which a learned Judge of this Court had to consider the weight of expert medical witnesses in a case of judicial divorce under the Mahomedan law. It was observed:
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1