Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.80 seconds)
Documents citing Bhanu Pratap Singh Yadav vs State Of U.P. And 2 Ors. on 22 October, 2020

Ranu Yadav vs State Of Up And 3 Others on 2 July, 2024

Review Application No. 107 of 2024 (Ranu Yadav vs. State of U.P. and 3 others) was subsequently filed against this order, leading to the consenting order dated 22.03.2024. Considering the objection that the order dated 22.03.2024, which is under challenge, was a consenting order, we do not find any good ground to accept any challenge, and accordingly, the special appeal stands rejected.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - M C Tripathi - Full Document

Jai Prakash vs State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. on 8 May, 2026

We are also of the view that the law laid down in the case of Harendra Kumar (supra) would be applicable in the facts and circumstances of the present case as proceedings in the said case arose out of the Rules, 1991, which was not so in the case of Kharak Singh (supra), hence, we do not agree with the view of the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Mohd. Haneef Khan (supra) and that of Bhanu Pratap Singh Yadav (supra).
Allahabad High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - S Srivastava - Full Document

Smt.Sukhraji Devi @ Basanti vs State Of U P And 2 Others on 18 January, 2023

Having considered the aforesaid and in view of the aforesaid decision of Sri Chandra Singh, this Court finds that the petitioner is not entitled to the pensionary benefits as the husband of the petitioner did not complete the minimum ten years in terms of the relevant Government Order to entitle him to give the pensionary benefits. The decision of Sri Bhanu Pratap Singh (Supra) as quoted above was on a different set of facts and is not applicable in the present facts and circumstances.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - J Singh - Full Document

Bhanu Pratap Singh Yadav vs State Of Up And 4 Others on 2 May, 2024

2. The present intra-court appeal is preferred questioning the validity of the impugned judgment and order dated 04.04.2024 in Writ-A No.4148 of 2024 (Bhanu Pratap Singh Yadav vs. State of U.P. and 4 others) passed by learned Single Judge, who has dismissed the writ petition on the ground of statutory alternative remedy of appeal under Rule, 20 of the U.P. Police Officers of the Sub-ordinate Ranks Punishment and Appeal Rules, 1991 (in short 'the Rules, 1991'). The said writ petition was preferred challenging the Removal from Service Order dated 25.02.2024 passed by the fourth respondent, who had awarded the punishment of major penalty to the petitioner, i.e. removal from his services under Rule 4(1)(a)(ii) of the Rules, 1991. It transpires from the record that the appellant-petitioner has also questioned the said Removal from Service Order dated 25.02.2024.
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - M C Tripathi - Full Document

Rajwati vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 14 February, 2023

"Issue a writ, order or direction in that nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay pension and other all retiral benefits to the petitioner by adding his services rendered as daily wages employee since 1.8.1989 to 31.7.2010 with his regular service for computation pension keeping in view of the judgment of apex court in the case of The State of Gujrat and others vs. Talsibhai Dhaijibhai Patel (Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 1109 of 2022) and Prem Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others 2019(10) SCC 516 as well as in the case of Bhanu Pratap Vs. State of U.P. and others (Writ-A No. 35301 of 2017 and Special Appeal No.97 of 2021 State of U.P. vs. Bhanu Pratap Sharma and Writ-A No. 19722 of 20198 Sita Devi vs. State of U.P. and others)"
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - N Tiwari - Full Document

Harish Chandra Pandey And 8 Ors. vs State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. ... on 24 May, 2023

"i) to issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS thereby commanding/directing the opposite parties particularly the opposite party no.1&2 to consider and pay the pension and other pensionary benefits to the petitioners in the light of judgment and order dated 01.08.2014 and 08.08.2014 passed by the Hon'ble Court in writ petition no.3896 (S/S) of 2014 and 4117 (S/S) of 2014: Parshuram Pal Vs. State of U.P. & others and Bhanu Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. & others forthwith."
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - V Chaudhary - Full Document
1   2 Next