Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.55 seconds)
Documents citing Murari Lal Gupta vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 1 September, 2017

Youth For Equality And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Another on 23 January, 2025

It is also not 2 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 27-01-2025 23:22:42 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:010074-DB CWP PIL No. 36 of 2021 3 disputed by learned counsel for the rival parties that the said decision of Murari Lal Gupta vs. State of Haryana (supra) is challenged before the Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 2261 of 2018 (Satvir Singh Saini and another vs. State of Haryana and others) is pending consideration till date.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Neeraj Sharma vs State Of Haryana And Another on 2 March, 2022

36. Respondent No. 1 has pleaded, inter alia, that after withdrawal of reservation for SBC category vide notification dated 31.03.2016 (Annexure P-4), the State Government enacted "The Haryana Backward Classes (Reservation In Services and Admission in Educational Institutions) Act, 2016 and provided six per cent reservation to BC-C Category in class I and II posts. Its operation was stayed by this Court vide order dated 26.05.2016 in CWP No. 9931 of 2016 Murari Lal Gupta v. State of Haryana & other. The State Government further decided to fill up all the vacancies of HCS (Executive Branch) for Register-B (direct recruitment) as available upto 31.12.2017. There were total 56 vacancies of HCS (Executive Branch) for Register-B available upto 31.12.2017. After retaining two vacancies for BC-C category from unreserved category and 6 vacancies for EBPGC category, the remaining 48 vacancies for register -B (direct recruitment) were available upto 31.12.2017. Requisition for selection for these posts was sent to the HPSC. These were advertised by the HPSC on 02.08.2018.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 1 - A Monga - Full Document

Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil vs The Chief Minister And Ors. on 18 March, 2021

This writ petition has been filed under Article 32 of the 16 Constitution of India praying that Haryana Backward Classes (Reservation in Services and Admission in Educational Institutions) Act, 2016 be declared as unconstitutional and void. The aforesaid enactment was challenged before the High Court in Writ Petition No. 9931 of 2016 titled Murari Lal Gupta v. State of Haryana & Ors. with a bunch of other writ petitions. The High Court vide judgment dated 01.09.2017 disposed of the writ petitions upholding the 2016 enactment.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Murari Lal Alias Billu vs State Of Haryana on 22 April, 2025

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier petitioner had been granted bail, but on account of his absence, he was declared 'proclaimed person' by the trial Court vide order dated 09.09.2024. Thereupon, petitioner filed a petition i.e. CRM-M-7783-2025 (O&M), titled as, "Murari Lal v. State of Haryana", before this Court, against the order, vide which he was declared 'proclaimed person', however, vide order dated 11.02.2025 (Annexure 1 of 3 ::: Downloaded on - 24-04-2025 03:06:05 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2025:PHHC:051736 CRM-M-12073-2025 -2- P-5), same was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the learned Trial Court, and to move an application for grant of regular bail before the said Court within a period of 10 days, and thereupon, the bail application was to be decided within next two days, by considering the documents, if any, produced in regard to the medical treatment of the petitioner.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1