Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.35 seconds)
Documents citing Ram Krishna Chaudhary And Ors. With ... vs State Of Bihar/Jharkhand And Ors. on 27 June, 2001

Randhir Kumar Singh vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors. on 22 June, 2016

Counsel for the State submits that the Regional Director, had no power to promote and thus, the promotion granted to the petitioners is illegal. He further submits that in the case of Ram Krishna Choudhary & others Vs. The State of Bihar/Jharkhand & Ors in CWJC Case No. 536 of 2000(R) this Hon'ble Court has held that the Regional Director of Animal Husbandry Department was not competent to make any appointment. He submits that since the promotion was granted without authority or jurisdiction there is no illegality in recalling -3- the same. He submits that an illegality can be cured at any point of time and as such the petitioners cannot be allowed to take plea that they have worked on the promoted post for 20 years and thus their promotion orders cannot be recalled. It is lastly submitted that petitioner nos. 1 and 2 have already been superannuated from the services and as such their post retiral benefits cannot be fixed taking into consideration that they have been promoted to Class III posts.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A Sen - Full Document

Mahendra Nath Mahto And Ors vs The State Of Jharkhand And Ors on 29 August, 2014

3. Party   in   person   submitted   that   previously   these   applicants   have  preferred writ petition being W.P.(S) No. 3802 of 2012, which has been  decided   by   this   Court   vide   order   dated   30th   October,   2012   and   it   was  disposed of by similar order dated 30th August, 2012 passed by this Court  in   W.P.(S)   No.   3942   of   2012   (Asha   Kumari   Pathak   Vs.   The   State   of  Jharkhand & Ors.) which is at Annexure­1/1 to this contempt application.  It is submitted by the party in person that this Court has allowed the writ  petition and salary and other benefits have been ordered to be paid with  interest @ 5%  per  annum.  These  applicants have  to receive   per person  approximately more than Rs.6,00,000/­.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - D N Patel - Full Document

Arun Bek And Ors vs The State Of Jharkhand And Ors on 29 August, 2014

3. Party   in   person   submitted   that   previously   these   applicants   have  preferred writ petition being W.P.(S) No. 3788 of 2012, which was allowed  vide order dated 10th December, 2012 on the same terms of the judgment  of this Court dated 30th August, 2012 passed in W.P.(S) No. 3942 of 2012  (Asha Kumari Pathak Vs The State of Jharkhand & others). It is submitted  by the party in person that the order passed in W.P.(S) No. 3942 of 2012  dated 30th August, 2012 is at Annexure­1/1 to this contempt application in  which this Court has passed an order to make payment of arrears of salary  and other benefits to be paid with interest @ 5 % per annum.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - D N Patel - Full Document

Md Aslam Ansari And Ors vs The State Of Jharkhand And Ors on 30 August, 2014

1. This contempt application has been preferred mainly for the reason  that earlier these applicants had preferred writ petition being W.P.(S) No.  3709   of   2012   which   was   allowed   by   this   Court   vide   order   dated   30th  October, 2012 in terms of the judgment delivered by this Court vide order  dated   30th   August,   2012   in   W.P.(S)   No.   3942   of   2012   (Asha   Kumari  Pathak Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.).
Jharkhand High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - D N Patel - Full Document

Shrimati Usha Jha And Ors vs The State Of Jharkhand And Ors on 29 August, 2014

3. Party   in   person   submitted   that   previously   these   applicants   have  preferred writ petition being W.P.(S) No. 3255 of 2012, which has been  decided by this Court vide order dated 10th December, 2012 and it was  disposed of by similar order dated 30th August, 2012 passed by this Court  in   W.P.(S)   No.   3942   of   2012   (Asha   Kumari   Pathak   Vs.   The   State   of  Jharkhand & Ors.) which is at Annexure­1/1 to this contempt application.  It is submitted by the party in person that this Court has allowed the writ  petition and salary and other benefits have been ordered to be paid with  interest @ 5%  per  annum.  These  applicants have  to receive   per person  approximately more than Rs.6,00,000/­.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - D N Patel - Full Document

Ganpati Pradhan And Ors vs The State Of Jharkhand And Ors on 29 August, 2014

3. Party   in   person   submitted   that   previously   these   applicants   have  preferred writ petition being W.P.(S) No. 3040 of 2012, which has been  decided by this Court vide order dated 10th December, 2012 and it was  disposed of by similar order dated 30th August, 2012 passed by this Court  in   W.P.(S)   No.   3942   of   2012   (Asha   Kumari   Pathak   Vs.   The   State   of  Jharkhand & Ors.) which is at Annexure­1/1 to this contempt application.  It is submitted by the party in person that this Court has allowed the writ  petition and salary and other benefits have been ordered to be paid with  interest @ 5%  per  annum.  These  applicants have  to receive   per person  approximately more than Rs.6,00,000/­.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - D N Patel - Full Document

Chawi Khalkho And Ors vs The State Of Jharkhand And Ors on 29 August, 2014

3. Party   in   person   submitted   that   previously   these   applicants   have  preferred writ petition being W.P.(S) No. 4109 of 2012, which has been  decided   by   this   Court   vide   order   dated   30th   October,   2012   and   it   was  disposed of by similar order dated 30th August, 2012 passed by this Court  in   W.P.(S)   No.   3942   of   2012   (Asha   Kumari   Pathak   Vs.   The   State   of  Jharkhand & Ors.) which is at Annexure­1/1 to this contempt application.  It is submitted by the party in person that this Court has allowed the writ  petition and salary and other benefits have been ordered to be paid with  interest @ 5%  per  annum.  These  applicants have  to receive   per person  approximately more than Rs.6,00,000/­.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - D N Patel - Full Document
1   2 3 Next