Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 44 (3.88 seconds)
Documents citing Karnataka Bank Ltd vs State Of A.P. & Ors on 21 January, 2008

Parmar Samantsinh Umedsinh vs State Of Gujarat on 24 February, 2021

Similarly, in Karnataka Bank Ltd. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors., (2008) 2 SCC 254. This Court held that the definition of person under Section 3(42) of the General Clauses Act is not applicable automatically to interpret the provision of the Constitution unless the context so requires and makes the definition applicable. Again, there can be no dispute to the preposition as laid down in the above case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 72 - Cited by 8 - A Bhushan - Full Document

Bandarupalli Rajeswari, vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh, on 29 November, 2019

If that which is passed into law is within the scope of the power conferred on a Legislature and violates no restrictions on that power, the law must be upheld whatever a Court may think of it. (vide Karnataka Bank Limited v. State of A.P14). Thus, the Court has to keep in mind the presumption of the constitutionality and such statute passed by Legislature. If, for any reason, the Statute passed by the Legislature is violative of any fundamental rights guaranteed under Constitution of India which expressly confers upon the Courts the power of judicial review and as regards fundamental rights, the Court has been, by the present Article, assigned the role of a sentinel on the 'qui vive'.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 99 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunil Sikri vs Guru Harkrishan Public School on 28 July, 2022

He relies upon the judgment of this Court in State of A.P. v. P. Narasimha and another2 and Karnataka Bank Ltd. v. State of Andhra Pradesh and others3. The Lawgiver intended to create a Specialised Tribunal. Being a Specialised Tribunal, it has all the power of an Appellate Court. The statutory Rule cannot be inconsistent or repugnant with the parent Act. Rule 121 1 (2001) 8 SCC 676 2 (1994) 4 SCC 453 3 (2008) 2 SCC 254 10 is confined to cases of dismissal, removal and compulsory retirement.
Supreme Court of India Cites 31 - Cited by 2 - K Joseph - Full Document

Afr M/S. Sgs Mines And Industries vs State Of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opp. Parties on 21 September, 2022

In Karnataka Bank Ltd. v. State of A.P., (2008) 2 SCC 254, the apex Court held in pronouncing on the constitutional validity of a statute, the Court is not concerned with the wisdom or un-wisdom, the justice or injustice of the law. If that which is passed into law is within the scope of the power conferred on a Legislature and violates no restrictions on that power, the law must be upheld whatever a Court may think of it. The parent act may be unconstitutional on several grounds, i.e. (i) excessive delegation; or (ii) breach of a Fundamental Right; or (iii) on any other ground such as, distribution of powers between the Centre and the State.
Orissa High Court Cites 50 - Cited by 0 - B R Sarangi - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next