citedby: 1510883

1 - 4 of 4 (1.35 seconds)

15. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has relied upon 2012 Rajdhani Law Reporter (Note) 3, titled as "Abdul Malik Vs. Shashi Bhalla", 172 (2010) Delhi Law Times 551 Delhi High Court, titled as "Kharati Ram Khanna & Sons Vs. Krishna Luthra", 169 (2010) Delhi Law Times 769 Delhi High Court, titled as "Krishan Lal Vs. R.N. Bakshi", 173 (2010) Delhi Law Times 318 Delhi High Court, titled as "Labhu Lal Vs. Sandhya Gupta" and 135 (2006) Delhi Law Times 453 Delhi High Court, titled as "Mahabir Prasad & Anr. Vs. Ved Wati Pathak & Ors.".

Delhi District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

(x) Mahabir Parshad & Anr. Vs. Ved Wati & Ors.,135 (2006) DLT 453 E-219/10 S.Kuldeep Singh Vs. Ravinder Kumar Page 6 of 9 //7//

Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

7. I have heard Ld. Counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the respondent and have perused the record carefully. Counsel for the petitioner has also relied upon the judgments Vinod Chander Vs Ishwar Dayal 2005 (1) RCR 306; Mahabir Prashad & Anr. Vs Ved Wati Pathak & Ors. 2007 (1) RCJ 224; Manmohan Nath Vs Subhash Chander 2004 (2) RCR 357; Jai Rani Vs Rakesh Kumar Gupta & Ors. 2006 (1) RCJ 320; Dr. B.K. Dawesar Vs K.K. Sapra 2006(1) RCR 223; S.N. Bhatia Vs Sita Bijai Singh 1993 RLR 431; Wing Commander Tapeshwar Puri (through LRs) Vs Lee Club Francais 2007 (1) RCJ 1, in support of his arguments. I have carefully perused the judgements relied upon by the counsel for the petitioner besides the pleadings of the parties, 6 documents filed by them and evidence produced before the court.

Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Search Results Page