Rajveer Sharma vs State Of U.P. Through Its Principal ... on 9 February, 2021
20. Facts of Writ Petition No.4918 (SS) of 2012 (Kashi Ram Shukla v. The State of U.P. and others) are that the petitioner was appointed on the post of Cooperative Supervisor and while working on the said post, his services were confirmed. On 22.5.1995, respondent no.3 issued an order granting promotion to 101 persons including petitioner on the post of Cooperative Inspector Group-II/ Assistant Development Officer (Cooperative) and in pursuance thereof, he joined on the said post on 6.6.1995. The U.P. Public Service Commission, Allahabad vide its letter dated 4.7.2003 has given recommendations for regularization of petitioner's promotion on the post of Cooperative Inspector Group-II/ Assistant Development Officer (Cooperative) along with others similarly situated person. Respondent no.3 regularizing 301 persons including the petitioner on 30.9.2003 and the petitioner was regularized against the vacancy of the year 1996-97. On 2.1.2008, respondent no.3 issued an order confirming services of 131 persons including the petitioner on the said post. The petitioner while working on the said post retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.10.2011 and as such, pension papers of petitioner were processed and were sent to respondent no.6 for release of government pension and gratuity to petitioner. Respondent no.7 on 26.12.2011 issued a letter to respondent no.5 raising certain objections to which respondent no.2 sent a letter on 22.2.2012 giving explanation to the objections. The matter was referred to respondent no.3 on 25.6.2012. The petitioner made representation before respondent no.4 on 14.8.2012 and 2.7.2012 and 17.8.2012 and when no order was passed, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.