Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.34 seconds)
Documents citing Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Rajiv Gupta And Ors. [Along With Cm No. ... on 28 August, 2006

Sh.Balraj Tyagi - Son vs Union Of India Through on 2 April, 2011

Further, the Hon'ble High Court after taking into account judicial pronouncement in Union of India v. Amar Singh RFA 464/88 and other connected appeals, decided on 7.2.2003, Jai Lal (dead) through L.Rs Vs. UOI 94 (2001), DLT 429, Om Parkash (dead) by L.Rs and others Vs. UOI & Anr. 2004 VII AD (SC) 37, determining fair market value of land in village Bhorgarh, in the vicinity of LAC No.466A/08 Page 9 of 15 village Holambi Kalan, observed that :­ ".......The High Court had granted compensation @ Rs.82,255/­ per bigha . Still another notification was issued for acquisition of land in village Bhogarh for acquiring a land measuring about 52 acres for construction of godowns for Food Corporation of India etc. in the village Bhorgarh and the other two villages and the Supreme Court approved the grant of compensation to the claimants @ Rs.82,255/­ per bigha. As in 1979 as well as in 1982­83......." ........It is clear from the various judgments which are judicial precedents in relation to the land situated in the revenue estate of Bhorgarh adjacent to the acquired land that the same had received compensation of Rs. 82,255/­ per bigha for acquisition of the land in the year 1982, then by any standards, the present claimants are certainly entitled to enhancement at least of some compensation for compulsive acquisition of their lands which were also LAC No.466A/08 Page 10 of 15 their livelihood. ..........."
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shyam Singh vs Union Of India Through on 11 December, 2012

Further, the Hon'ble High Court after taking into account judicial pronouncement in Union of India v. Amar Singh RFA 464/88 and other connected appeals, decided on 7.2.2003, Jai Lal (dead) through L.Rs Vs. UOI 94 (2001), DLT 429, Om Parkash (dead) by L.Rs and others Vs. UOI & Anr. 2004 VII AD (SC) 37, determining fair market value of land in village Bhorgarh, in the vicinity of village Holambi Kalan, observed that :­ ".......The High Court had granted compensation @ Rs.82,255/­ per bigha . Still another notification was issued for acquisition of land in village Bhogarh for acquiring a land measuring about 52 acres for construction of godowns for Food Corporation of India etc. in the village Bhorgarh and the other two villages and the Supreme Court approved the grant of compensation to the claimants @ Rs.82,255/­ per bigha. As in 1979 as well as in 1982­83......." ........It is clear from the various judgments which are judicial precedents in relation to the land situated in the revenue estate of Bhorgarh adjacent to the acquired land that the same had received compensation of Rs. 82,255/­ per bigha for LAC No.77A/11 Page 7 of 11 acquisition of the land in the year 1982, then by any standards, the present claimants are certainly entitled to enhancement at least of some compensation for compulsive acquisition of their lands which were also their livelihood. ..........." Thus petitioners are entitled to same enhancement."
Delhi District Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mr.S.V Mohandas vs The Controller Of Communication ... on 19 August, 2011

4. M.A 917/2010 has been filed for condonation of delay involved in filing this Original Application. There is a delay of 141 days in filing the Original Application and the applicant has spelt out the reasons for the delay. The reasons being justified, the delay is condoned. It is also pertinent to mention here that the cause of action is reckoning in this case and as such the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Union of India versus Mr.M.R Gupta, applies.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Ernakulam Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1