Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.46 seconds)

State vs Dinesh on 15 February, 2016

7. Thereafter, Prosecution Evidence was closed as all the material witnesses were examined and statement of the accused was recorded wherein all the incriminating circumstances appearing in evidence were Page No.4/12 FIR No. 414/13 PS: Vijay Vihar U/s 33 Delhi Excise Act State Vs Dinesh put to the accused who stated that nothing was recovered from his possession at the relevant time and he has been falsely implicated in the present case by the police officials by planting the case property upon him. The accused chose not to lead defence evidence.
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1