Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.85 seconds)
Documents citing Dr.Nawal Kishore Prasad vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors. on 10 May, 2013

The State Of Jhrkhand Through The ... vs Yamuna Ram on 20 April, 2022

5. Before the review Court, the respondent No.1 placed reliance on the judgments in "Nawal Kishore v. State of Jharkhand and others" 2013 (1) JCR 495; "Devendra Pratap Narain Rai Sharma v. State of Uttar Pradesh and others" AIR 1962 SC 1334; and "Arjun Chaubey v. Union of India and others" (1984) 2 SCC 578 to submit that he was entitled for back wages on his reinstatement in service. On the other hand, the State of Jharkhand raised a question on maintainability of the review petition which however was rejected by the review Court on the ground that sufficient foundation has been laid in Ground Nos. B, C and E of the memorandum of review petition.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mrs.John Maria vs M/S Central Coal Field Ltd.& O on 18 November, 2016

3. Referring to order dated 17.11.2003 passed in Title Suit No.227 of 2000 and legal-notice issued by the petitioner on 18.08.2004, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled for back-wages atleast from 12.07.1999 till she was reinstated on 12.08.2011. It is contended that the petitioner, who was ready and willing to discharge her duty and who was prevented on account of illegal order of termination from service dated 12.07.1999, is entitled for full back-wages and allowances from the date of her termination from service. The learned counsel refers to and relies on decisions in "Nawal Kishore v. State of Jharkhand & Ors." reported in 2013 (1) JCR 495 (Jhr), "Arjun Chaubey v. Union of Indian & Ors." reported in (1984) 2 SCC 578 and "Devendra Pratap Narain Rai Sharma v. State of U.P" reported in AIR 1962 SC 1334 to fortify the contention .
Jharkhand High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S Chandrashekhar - Full Document

Garib Mahto vs State Of Jharkhand And Ors. In W. P. (S) ... on 7 March, 2019

Learned counsel for the respondents has opposed the prayer and has relied upon the judgment rendered in the case of Dr. Nawal Kishore Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors. in W. P. (S) No. 5329 of 2007 on 10.05.2013 and the judgement rendered by the Apex Court in the case of State of Uttarakhand Vs. Umakant Joshi reported in 2012(11) SCC 164 and has submitted that cause of action of the petitioner has -2- arisen before the bifurcation of the State and as such, appropriate forum is High Court of Judicature at Patna and not before this Court.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R Kumar - Full Document

Bandhani Devi vs The State Of Jharkhand on 1 May, 2024

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court vide order dated 21.08.2023 passed in W.P.(S) No. 3011/2020, has already quashed the order as contained in memo No. 1276 dated 20.06.2019 issued by the Director, Higher Education, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi whereby the claim of the said petitioners for pay fixation in the revised pay scale in terms with 5th Pay 1 Revision was rejected. Subsequently, in another writ petition being W.P.(S) No. 2914/2020 (Nawal Kishore Oraon Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.), this Court vide order dated 10.04.2024 taking note of the fact that the same impugned order was already quashed by a Bench of this Court in W.P.(S) No. 3011/2020, directed the Director, Higher Education, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi to extend the benefits of 5th Pay Revision to the said petitioner in the light of recommendation made by the Ranchi University and also to grant the revised pay scale as per the 6th & 7th Pay Revisions w.e.f. 01.01.2006 & 01.01.2016 respectively including the arrears accruing on account of the aforesaid revised pay scales. It is also submitted that since the petitioner's case is similarly situated to that of Nawal Kishore Oraon, she may also be given the same relief.
Jharkhand High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R Shankar - Full Document
1