Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 42 (1.08 seconds)
Documents citing Md. Aquil Ahmad @ Md. Aquil vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 12 July, 2018

Jaykumar Gond vs The State Of Bihar on 25 September, 2024

5. Considering the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in case of Md. Akil Ahmad vs. State of Bihar and Others reported in (2016) 4 PLJR 968 and further considering the judgment passed by this Court in case of Jitendra Sharma vs. Richa Singh and Chandra Prakash Gupta @ Chandra Prakash vs. Soni Kumari & Anr in Criminal Revision Nos. 311/2024 and 318/2024 respectively, learned counsel for the petitioner in this case is directed to convert this revision petition into the application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India within two weeks' from today, thereafter, this matter will be listed before appropriate Bench having roster.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Syed Mujaffar Hussain vs Syeda Nahida Montaz on 27 March, 2019

In the Md. Akil Ahmad (Supra), it has been held that such an interlocutory order is neither amenable to appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Court Act nor revision envisaged under Section 19(4) of the Act and under Sub-Section 5 of Section 19 of the Act, puts an express bar regarding the appellate and revisional jurisdiction in the matter of judgment, order or decree of a Family Court, except as provide under Section 19 of the Act. It is further held that from the conjoint reading of Section 10 and 20 of the Act, the inherent power of the High Court under Section 482 CrPC cannot be invoked, against the order granting interim maintenance u/s.125 CrPC, in as much as the applicability of the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure is confined only before the Family Court under the proceedings of Chapter 9 of the Code.
Gauhati High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - R K Phukan - Full Document

Anjani Kumar Mishra vs East Central Railway on 2 July, 2024

19. Shri Rajendra Prasad, learned counsel for applicant, has relied on Hon'ble Supreme Court judgments in case of State of Jharkhand & Ors versus Jitendra Kumar Srivastava, (2013) 12 SCC 210, Dr. r. Hira Lal versus State of Bihar and others, (2020) 4 SCC 346, Maniben Maganbhai Bhariya versus District Development Officer Dahod, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 507, and Hon'ble High Co Court, urt, Patna judgment in case of Dr. Aquil Ahmad versus State of Bihar & Ors, reported in (2021) 1 PLJR 293.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Patna Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sujit Kumar Roy vs The State Of Bihar on 5 July, 2021

He has also relied on a co-ordinate Bench decision of this Court in case of Dr. Aquil Ahmed v. State of Bihar reported in 2021 (1) P.L.J.R. 293 in support of the contention that gratuity cannot be withheld. He has argued that even Rule 43 (d) could not have been invoked by the respondents to withhold the amount of gratuity which can be done only when a proceeding is found to be pending on the date of retirement of a government servant.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - C S Singh - Full Document

Naresh Prasad Singh @ Naresh Singh vs State Of Bihar And Anr on 6 July, 2022

In this revision application since the impugned order dated 06.04.2018 passed in Maintenance Case No. 84 of 2016 by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Nawada is in the nature of an interim order, learned counsel for the petitioner having understood that revision application under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act, 1984 cannot be maintained against an interim order in view of the Hon'ble Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Akil Ahmad Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. reported in 2016 (4) PLJR 968, prays for permission to convert this application in an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India within two weeks from today.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R R Prasad - Full Document

Sanjay Kumar vs State Of Bihar And Anr on 6 July, 2022

In this revision application since the impugned order dated 08.05.2018 passed in Maintenance Case No. 183 of 2016 is in the nature of an interim order, learned counsel for the petitioner having understood that revision application under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act, 1984 cannot be maintained against an interim order in view of the Hon'ble Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Akil Ahmad Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. reported in 2016 (4) PLJR 968, prays for permission to convert this application in an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India within two weeks from today.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R R Prasad - Full Document

Navin Chaurasia @ Navin Kumar Chaurasia ... vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 26 August, 2022

In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in the case of Md. Akil Ahmad vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. reported in 2016 (4) PLJR 968, the revision application is not maintainable. Moreover, it appears Patna High Court CR. REV. No.1039 of 2018(6) dt.26-08-2022 2/2 that the revision has been filed with a delay of over 44 days.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - R R Prasad - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 Next