Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (1.26 seconds)
Documents citing Ravinder Singh vs Vi-A.D.J. Ghaziabad And Ors. on 25 January, 2010

State vs . 1. Narender on 22 May, 2015

133 of 187 134 FIR No. 21/10 PS - Narela The Hon'ble Apex Court in Ravinder Kumar Vs. State of Punjab, VI (2001) SLT 471 has held as under :­ "The law has not fixed any time limit for lodging of FIR. Hence, a delayed FIR is not illegal. Of course a prompt and immediate lodging of the FIR is ideal as that would give the prosecution a twin advantage. First is that it affords commencement of the investigation without any time lapse. Second is that it expels the opportunity for any possible concoction of a false version."
Delhi District Court Cites 53 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . 1. Nadeem Khan on 20 July, 2015

The Hon'ble Apex Court in Ravinder Kumar Vs. State of Punjab, VI (2001) SLT 471 has held as under :­ 95 of 153 96 FIR No. 180/12 PS - Aman Vihar "The law has not fixed any time limit for lodging of FIR. Hence, a delayed FIR is not illegal. Of course a prompt and immediate lodging of the FIR is ideal as that would give the prosecution a twin advantage. First is that it affords commencement of the investigation without any time lapse. Second is that it expels the opportunity for any possible concoction of a false version."
Delhi District Court Cites 43 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Deepak @ Deep Chand on 6 February, 2016

The Hon'ble Apex Court in Ravinder Kumar Vs. State of Punjab, VI (2001) SLT 471 has held as under :­ "The law has not fixed any time limit for lodging of FIR. Hence, a delayed FIR is not illegal. Of course a prompt and immediate lodging of the FIR is ideal as that would give the prosecution a twin 113 of 202 114 FIR No. 50/10 PS - Jahangir Puri advantage. First is that it affords commencement of the investigation without any time lapse. Second is that it expels the opportunity for any possible concoction of a false version."
Delhi District Court Cites 69 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1