Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.45 seconds)

M/S Amy Agro Pvt. Ltd vs Of on 27 October, 2015

The view taken by the Bombay High Court in M/s Vinay's case (supra), was followed by another Division Bench of the same Court in Keystone Constructions vs. State Bank of India and others, CWP No. 1382 of 2013, decided on 08.10.2013 and thereafter followed by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Satnam Agri Products Ltd. and others vs. Union of India and others, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 7158 of 2014 decided on 10.12.2014.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M/S. Sunshine Builders And Developers vs Hdfc Bank Limited And Ors. on 4 February, 2026

A similar view has also been taken by the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Satnam Agri Products (supra), which goes on to hold that there is no reason to exempt the appeals arising out of the orders passed by the DRT on interlocutory applications merely on the ground that the said orders do not have the effect of staying the action or measures taken by the secured creditor under sub-section (4) of Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act for enforcement of security interest.
Bombay High Court Cites 40 - Cited by 0 - R I Chagla - Full Document

Ambala Automobiles India Limited vs District Magistrate And Others on 9 October, 2020

2. When a question was posed by the Court, particularly with reference to the above and the remaining prayers, as to why the Petitioner could first not approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal ('DRT'), Mr. Aalok Jagga, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner drew the attention of this Court to the decision of the DRT-II, Chandigarh in SA No.870 of 2017 (M/s Maxx Metal Pvt. Ltd. Company and others v. Indian Overseas Bank), wherein the DRT has purportedly, based upon the decision of the High Court of Delhi in Satnam Agri Products Ltd. v. Union of India 2014 (79) RCR (Civil) 661, formed an opinion that the DRT does not have enough power to issue any direction to the bank to consider rehabilitation/resettlement proposals.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S Muralidhar - Full Document
1