Mohd. Farid Shams vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors on 27 January, 2023
4. Learned counsel for the State/respondents submits that in pursuance of
the aforesaid advertisement (Annexure-P/1), the petitioner had submitted his
application form for the post of Skilled Attendant on 19.02.2013 along with
relevant documents (Annexure-P/2). The respondent authorities constituted a
selection committee to initiate the recruitment process. The selection committee
have been scrutinized relevant documents submitted by the candidates and it has
been found that the petitioner has not enclosed the experience certificate, but he
mentioned that the experience certificate has been enclosed along with his
application form for the post of Skilled Attendant. Thereafter, a merit list of eligible
candidates for the post of Skilled Attendant (R & AC) has been prepared in
accordance with the provision as laid down in para 03 of the advertisement
(Annexure-P/1), wherein, the petitioner's name appeared at Serial No. 16 (with
total 64.45 marks) (the same has been filed by the petitioner as Annexure-P/3). It
is further submitted that the petitioner has not submitted his experience certificate,
therefore, he has not been allotted marks against experience by the selection
committee. He next submits that the petitioner has filed an objection before
respondent No. 3 on 29.06.2013 (Annexure-P/4) along with relevant documents
and experience certificate, requesting therein to add his name and extend the
benefit of marks against the experience. He next submits that the objection of the
petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 26.07.2013 (Annexure-P/5) on the
1 (2005) 9 SCC 779.