Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 27 (2.02 seconds)
Documents citing M/S Ajay Protech Pvt. Ltd vs General Manager, on 18 January, 2019

M/S. Esi Corporation vs M/S. Quality Care India Limited Care ... on 21 November, 2025

20. For all the aforesaid reasons, this Court finds it difficult to accept the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner when it questions the power of a Civil Court in deciding the petition under Section 29A(4) of the Act. Another reason which this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order is that the issue of jurisdiction was not the focal point of contention while deciding the above A.O.P.No.172 of 2023 by the Trial Court. The points for consideration by the Trial Court before passing the impugned order were that : (a) could a petition which was filed for extension of time for completion of arbitral proceedings which were terminated on 31.12.2020 be entertained at the first instance; and (b) after a considerable period of time had got lapsed from the period the mandate got terminated, such a petition can be entertained or not. Both these points have been Page 14 of 14 crp_3701_2025 PSK,J answered by the Trial Court by giving elaborate reasons and also taking note of the recent decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of M/s.Ajay Protech Pvt. Ltd. vs. General Manager & another 4 wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court had held that extension of time can be entertained and granted even after expiry of statutory extendable period.
Telangana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - P S Koshy - Full Document
1   2 3 Next