Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.29 seconds)
Documents citing Dr. Meena Chaudhary @Dr. Meena ... vs Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. . on 14 March, 2014

M. Padma Narayan Singh vs The Special C.P. Law And Order &Amp Ors on 19 August, 2014

JD has filed no supporting document to show that she is the owner of the DDA Flat No.1260, Sector D, Pocket-I, Vasant Kunj, since 01.05.2003. On the contrary, copy of JD’s Writ Petition (Crl. No.1116 of 2010) titled as "Dr. Meena P.N. Singh vs. BSES & Ors." filed before Hon’ble High Court of Delhi shows that JD herself referred to the suit property as Guest House run by Aglomed Co. and claimed to be in occupation of one of its room. The petition is dated 30.07.2010. JD has not disputed this document.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Pintu Peter vs Sh. Michael And Ors on 30 September, 2014

7. As far as prima facie case is concerned, it is an undisputed fact that the plaintiff is residing in the suit property. Whether he is residing as an owner as asserted by the plaintiff or merely as a licencee as alleged by the defendant, is beyond the purview of the present application. Electricity being a basic aminity, is required in every household for its fruitful enjoyment. It has been similarly held by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Dr. Meena Chaudhary @ Dr. Meena P.N. Singh vs BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd., VI (2013) SLT 203 that even an occupier of premises is entitled as of his own right, to supply of electricity in his own name, if the owner is not willing for supply of electricity in his name. So there is a prima facie case in plaintiff's favour as the electricity connection is disconnected in the suit property.
Delhi District Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1