Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (1.98 seconds)

Somarajan vs State Of Kerala on 5 April, 2006

9. We are of the view, above contention is not available to the counsel since we have already taken the view that petitioner Society was not affiliated to the State Cooperative Union prior to 60 days from the date of the election. At the time of preparation of the voters list of the Co-operative Union, the petitioner society had not renewed its affiliation with the State Co-operative Union. We have found that Raju John's case and Sudhakara Kurup's case are not correctly decided. We declare only those cooperative societies which are affiliated and functioning alone will have the right to vote and contest in the election to the Circle Co-operative Union. Societies which have not renewed their affiliation sixty days before the date of election and not functioning are not entitled to vote and contest in the election to the Circle Co-operative Union and therefore cannot be included in the voters list and hence disentitled to raise that contention. In view of the above mentioned declaration, all these Writ Petitions fail and are accordingly dismissed.

Perumbavoor Urban Service ... vs State Of Kerala on 2 November, 2017

In John Mathew v. Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies (General), Adoor and Others [2018 (3) KHC 373], this Court held that the Registrar or any other person conferred with the powers of the Registrar under Section 69 of the Act is only a quasi- judicial authority and not a court. In such circumstances, the schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963 which prescribes the period of limitation only to proceedings in courts have no application to proceedings under Section 69 of the Act before the Arbitrator.
Kerala High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A Narendran - Full Document

Perumbavoor Urban Service ... vs State Of Kerala on 30 July, 2017

In John Mathew v. Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies (General), Adoor and Others [2018 (3) KHC 373], this Court held that the Registrar or any other person conferred with the powers of the Registrar under Section 69 of the Act is only a quasi- judicial authority and not a court. In such circumstances, the schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963 which prescribes the period of limitation only to proceedings in courts have no application to proceedings under Section 69 of the Act before the Arbitrator.
Kerala High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A Narendran - Full Document

Perumbavoor Urban Service ... vs State Of Kerala on 30 September, 2017

In John Mathew v. Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies (General), Adoor and Others [2018 (3) KHC 373], this Court held that the Registrar or any other person conferred with the powers of the Registrar under Section 69 of the Act is only a quasi- judicial authority and not a court. In such circumstances, the schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963 which prescribes the period of limitation only to proceedings in courts have no application to proceedings under Section 69 of the Act before the Arbitrator.
Kerala High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A Narendran - Full Document

Perumbavoor Urban Service Co-Perative ... vs State Of Kerala on 2 November, 2017

In John Mathew v. Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies (General), Adoor and Others [2018 (3) KHC 373], this Court held that the Registrar or any other person conferred with the powers of the Registrar under Section 69 of the Act is only a quasi- judicial authority and not a court. In such circumstances, the schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963 which prescribes the period of limitation only to proceedings in courts have no application to proceedings under Section 69 of the Act before the Arbitrator.
Kerala High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A Narendran - Full Document

Perumbavoor Urban Service ... vs State Of Kerala on 2 November, 2017

In John Mathew v. Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies (General), Adoor and Others [2018 (3) KHC 373], this Court held that the Registrar or any other person conferred with the powers of the Registrar under Section 69 of the Act is only a quasi- judicial authority and not a court. In such circumstances, the schedule to the Limitation Act, 1963 which prescribes the period of limitation only to proceedings in courts have no application to proceedings under Section 69 of the Act before the Arbitrator.
Kerala High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - A Narendran - Full Document
1