Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.44 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Sita Ram Sharma on 5 April, 2021

Decided On: 02.12.2025 vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 2 December, 2025

reiterated by the Division Bench of this Court in LPA No.231 of 2025, titled as State of Himachal Pradesh versus Gita Ram Sharma, decided on 27.08.2025. In these circumstances, the objection of the State Authorities cannot stand the test of judicial scrutiny, when, the conferment of Work Charge Status is just a grant of better status, with higher pay in running of pay scale, in lieu of the prolonged daily waged service rendered by such incumbent.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Decided On: 02.12.2025 vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 2 December, 2025

reiterated by the Division Bench of this Court in LPA No.231 of 2025, titled as State of Himachal Pradesh versus Gita Ram Sharma, decided on 27.08.2025. In these circumstances, the objection of the State Authorities cannot stand the test of judicial scrutiny, when, the conferment of Work Charge Status is just a grant of better status, with higher pay in running of pay scale, in lieu of the prolonged daily waged service rendered by such incumbent.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Suresh Sharma vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 30 December, 2025

5(v). Besides, the above, mere grant of regularization cannot be a ground to deny rt the Work Charge Status from an earlier date, in view of the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Himachal Pradesh versus Gehar Singh, (2007) 12 SCC 43, which principle was reiterated by the Division Bench of this Court in LPA No.231 of 2025, titled as State of Himachal Pradesh versus Gita Ram Sharma, decided on 27.08.2025.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sita Ram Sharma vs State Of Hp & Anr on 19 June, 2024

By way of instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner for quashing of Kalandra under Section 186 of Indian Penal Code filed by the Police Station Sunni, District Shimla, H.P., as well as consequent proceedings pending adjudication in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No. I, Shimla, District Shimla, HP in Kalandra No.1 of 2020 titled as State Vs. Sita Ram Sharma.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - S Sharma - Full Document

Decided On: 28.11.2025 vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & on 28 November, 2025

Even, the Division Bench of this Court, in various judgments in LPA No. 82 of 2025, titled as State of Himachal Pradesh and others versus Pritam Chand, decided on 27.08.2025, LPA No. 100 of 2025, titled as State of Himachal Pradesh and others versus Layak Ram, decided on 27.08.2025 and LPA No. 231 of 2025, titled as State of Himachal Pradesh and others versus Gita Ram Sharma, decided on 27.08.2025 has reiterated the entitlement for work charge status from the date of completion of 08 years of continuous daily waged service to daily wagers in Government Departments, which includes the Respondent-Forest Department. The Division Bench has further held that there is neither the
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Decided On: 06.11.2025 vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others on 6 November, 2025

benefits flowing from aforesaid judgment to all daily wagers, irrespective of the departments. Even, the Division Bench of this Court, in various judgments of in LPA No. 82 of 2025, titled as State of Himachal Pradesh and others versus Pritam Chand, decided rt on 27.08.2025, LPA No. 100 of 2025, titled as State of Himachal Pradesh and others versus Layak Ram, decided on 27.08.2025 and LPA No. 231 of 2025, titled as State of Himachal Pradesh and others versus Gita Ram Sharma, decided on 27.08.2025 has reiterated the entitlement of daily wagers for grant of work charge status from the date of completion of 8 years of continuous daily waged service to all incumbents working in Government Departments including the Respondent-Forest Department. It has further been held that there is neither the requirement of work charge establishment nor the abolition of work charge establishment or conversion of work charge posts
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Of Himachal Pradesh & Others vs Neem Chand on 9 October, 2023

3. Though, counsel for the appellants sought to contend that there is no need for acquisition of land, if the construction of road is made under the rt PMGSY Scheme, admittedly, such a contention has been rejected by a Full Bench of this Court in LPA no.33 of 2021 vide order dt. 03.11.2022, in State of Himachal Pradesh & Others vs. Sita Ram Sharma, and had declared that a person whose land has been utilized for construction of road under the said Scheme, is also entitled for compensation unless it is proved to the satisfaction of the Court that the land was voluntarily donated or given by him willingly with free will and consent for construction of such road.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 Next