Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.41 seconds)
Documents citing Ajay Kashyap vs Smt. Mohini Nijhawan on 18 December, 2003

Baljeet Singh vs Narinder Pal Kaur on 4 May, 2012

13. The Full Bench of this Court in Ajay Kashyap's case (supra), also after taking into consideration the provisions of Section 2(c) of the Rent Act, Haryana Housing Board Act, 1971 and The Chandigarh C.R. No.1801 of 2012(O&M) 10 Housing Board (Allotment, Management and Sale of Tenements) Regulations, 1979, overruled the judgment of this Court in Damyanti Bhalla vs. Pritpal Singla, 1999 (2) RCR 189 (P & H), wherein it was held that the landlord being an allottee of the Housing Board, was not entitled to evict his tenant under the provision of the Rent Act and went on to held that the provisions of Rent Act shall govern the inter se relationship between such allottees and their tenants.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document

Jagdish Parshad vs Trilok Chand on 30 May, 2012

18. A Full Bench of this Court in Ajay Kashyap's case (supra) has held that the properties belonging to the Haryana Housing Board would also be governed by the provisions of the Rent Act and the allottees who had rented out the dwelling units constructed by the Housing Board, would be landlords for the said purpose and ownership is not a relevant criteria. Another important aspect which is to be taken into consideration is that once there is a relationship of landlord-tenant between the parties, the tenant could not challenge the title without first surrendering the possession.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 54 - Cited by 1 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document

M/S Industrial Trade Links & Ors vs D.S. Ahujla & Anr on 21 February, 2015

The judgment relied upon by learned counsel for the respondents in Ajay Kashyap's case (supra) is not at all applicable in this case because in that case, the issue involved was as to whether the relationship between an allottee of dwelling unit allotted by the Chandigarh Housing Board and his tenant inducted by him is governed by the provisions of the East Punjab Urban Rent restriction Act, 1949 (here-in- after referred to as the "Act") and it was decided that the said allottee would be the landlord of the tenant and as such the provisions of the Act would be applicable to the dwelling units allotted by the Chandigarh Housing Board to the allottees.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 1 - R K Jain - Full Document
1